Search for: "*english v. Harris" Results 121 - 140 of 276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
The Court has also not yet ruled on Harris v. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 7:58 am
  It was sadly made into a not very good movie in 1977 starring an alcoholic Richard Harris. 3. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am by Marie Louise
(G 1/10) (IPKat) Another referral to the EBO, allowability of disclaimers (G 01/03) (IPKat) EPO: English version of notice concerning communications under amended Rule 161 EPC (IPKat) Eased patent translation requirements proposed in Europe (Inovia IP) (Patentology) Bloggers or Blaggers? [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 11:36 pm
In particular, the author’s analysis of the springboard doctrine, which has recently been the subject of litigation in the English courts, is a reminder that the Indian law on this point has some way to go to acquire a coherent shape. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am by Melina Padron
Ambrose v Harris (Procurator Fiscal, Oban) (Scotland) Her Majesty’s Advocate v G (Scotland) Her Majesty’s Advocate v M (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 43 October 6, 2011 Supreme Court: Scottish prosecutions based on questioning by police pre-detention without access to lawyer not ECHR breach. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
” Prince Harry has revealed that reforming the British press is now his life’s work. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:31 am by INFORRM
There is an existing precedent from the English court in this respect: the case of Author of a Blog v Times Newspapers Limited. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:08 am
Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Friday, October 12, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Director nominations, Proxy contests, Proxy voting, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting, Universal proxy ballots SEC Sanctions Investment Firm for Inadequate Cybersecurity and Identity Theft Prevention Policies Posted by Sabastian V. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
We're going to discuss one of them, the earlier one, today: Deese v. [read post]