Search for: "*long v. Brown" Results 121 - 140 of 3,612
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Civil rights law in the US is completely dead unless you’re not brown or poor. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Senate contests like Sherrod Brown’s in Ohio and Jon Tester’s in Montana. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
 It aims to lock up dangerous people for a long time. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:26 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Supreme Court has now granted certiorari in two cases challenging the continued viability of its long-standing decision in Chevron v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:07 am by Candace Milner
Attacking voting rights has been a long-held tool for conservatives to keep power. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm by John Elwood
But remarkably, seven relisted petitions still remain from the long conference. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Aaron, each Justice was listed as the author of the ruling that Arkansas Governor Orval Faubus and the Little Rock schools were not entitled to defy the desegregation mandate of Brown v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 5:21 am by Jack Bogdanski
"Ed Johnson, the long-time Oregon Law Center lawyer in the Portland case, was also the plaintiffs’ lawyer in the recent Grants Pass case that extended the rule adopted by the Ninth Circuit in the notorious decision Martin v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 10:27 pm by Martin Osborne
If you have any questions regarding the matters raised in this article, please contact the authors. [1] CCIG Investments Pty Ltd v Schokman [2023] HCA 21 at [4]-[6]. [2] Ibid at [12], citing Bugge v Brown (1919) 26 CLR 110 at 118; New South Wales v Lepore (2003) 212 CLR 511 at 589 [223]; Sweeney v Boylan Nominees Pty Ltd (2006) 226 CLR 161 at 173 [33]; Prince Alfred College Inc v ADC (2016) 258 CLR 134 at 148 [40]. [3] Ibid at [14]. [4] Schokman… [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
For example, self-styled originalists who don't want to be seen as rejecting Brown v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  That there is doubt about how many children he has (or acknowledges) seems more important than whether or not his name is in fact Joe Brown, but I digress. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:47 am by SHG
For example, in a 1969 case, Watts v. [read post]