Search for: "*richardson v. State of Texas"
Results 121 - 140
of 314
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Richardson School of Law Angela P. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:13 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:49 am
The fact that the settlement was accomplished through an opt-out class action did not raise an irreconcilable conflict with FLSA Section 216(b)’s mandate that FLSA claims cannot be asserted using an opt-out class action (Richardson v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:34 am
That same month, a federal district court in South Texas issued an injunction in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Spence, Professor of Law, Politics & Regulation, University of Texas School of Law and McCombs School of Business—Corporate Social Responsibility in the Shale Patch? [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:42 pm
In Perez v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 2:30 pm
Stated, “We at OCR remain particularly concerned with unaddressed risks that may lead to impermissi [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:35 pm
Desktop Direct, Inc., 511 U.S. 863, 868, 114 S.Ct. 1992, 1996 (1994) (quoting Richardson–Merrell, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 12:44 pm
Desktop Direct, Inc., 511 U.S. 863, 868, 114 S.Ct. 1992, 1996 (1994) (quoting Richardson–Merrell, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:05 pm
Self-insured employer or union sponsored health plans (Plans), their fiduciaries, third party administrative or other service providers, and sponsors should consult legal counsel for advice about whether their Plans might violate the Privacy Rule of the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) by disclosing individually identifiable claims or other Plan records or data to a state “all payer” claims or other data base in response to a state law or… [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:48 am
State "may be one of the more significant traffic stop decisions that the [Texas Court of Criminal Appeals] has issued. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:47 am
Grits earlier examined the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals' recent Fourth Amendment jurisprudence for patterns and trends ("Divided Court of Criminal Appeals in flux"), and a commenter suggested the opinions in State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
In Florida v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:04 am
Abbott, the “one person, one vote” challenge to the state legislative maps in Texas. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
Abbott, No. 14-940 (U.S. 2015), in which the Petitioners, a pair of Texas voters, seek to dramatically change the constitutional requirements for redistricting state legislatures. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:44 am
State of Minnesota v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
How many states have done that? [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
Ohio, 395 U.S. 444, 447 (1969) (recognizing the First Amendment rights of Ku Klux Klan members to advocate for white supremacy-based political reform achieved through violent means); Texas v. [read post]
