Search for: "2013-A Property Holdings LLC"
Results 121 - 140
of 725
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
INTRODUCTION Letters of intent are pre-contract documents. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:01 am
“Plaintiff, a general contractor, entered into a construction agreement with nonparty Well-Come Holdings, Inc. to perform construction and excavation work on property owned by Well-Come. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Rejecting the appellate court’s holding that all well permits were discretionary based on its reading of the “horizontal distance” requirement, the California Supreme Court took on a more nuanced view which deferred to the agency to make such determinations on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
Rejecting the appellate court’s holding that all well permits were discretionary based on its reading of the “horizontal distance” requirement, the California Supreme Court took on a more nuanced view which deferred to the agency to make such determinations on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:46 am
One month later, the buying member sold the LLC’s property to a third-party buyer for $2.9 million. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
See MB Plaza, LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
See MB Plaza, LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
See MB Plaza, LLC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:48 pm
Further the firm and its associated persons received 12b-1 fees for advising clients to invest in or hold such mutual fund share classes. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 11:57 am
It will be tempting for both parties to hold their assets (at least temporarily) as one of the three categories above. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 4:41 am
Over time, Weinstein became limited partner and RAS Property Management LLC (“RAS”) general partner of the Partnership. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 5:53 am
VTRE Investments, LLC v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Rejecting the appellate court’s holding that all well permits were discretionary based on its reading of the “horizontal distance” requirement, the California Supreme Court took on a more nuanced view which deferred to the agency to make such determinations on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 10:28 pm
The court will hold a confirmation hearing, after which the court must find that the plan is: Feasible The court must find that confirmation is not likely to be followed by liquidation or the need for another reorganization. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 1:51 am
According to the petition, the LLCs were formed between 2011 to 2013 for the purpose of acquiring and operating a number of multifamily properties located in Manhattan. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:13 pm
DeliverMed Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
Golden Door Properties, LLC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:39 pm
Golden Door Properties, LLC et al. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:14 am
On December 21, 2012, the buyer’s title insurance company raised certain objections [*2]to the sellers’ title to the subject property. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:59 pm
Until around 2013, the price was relatively high compared to the merger price, and there were cases where the premium was around 50%, but in recent years, it has been almost zero, that is, the court has adopted the merger price as a fair price. [read post]