Search for: "A CHOICE FOR WOMEN V. AGENCY FOR HEALTH"
Results 121 - 140
of 203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
Currently, Washington, DC’s alphabet agencies are operating overtime – the Department of Health and Human Services regulating healthcare, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau imposing the Dodd-Frank Act, the EPA setting global warming standards, and on and on. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
And in case you missed this… Open letter to the Professional Standards Agency. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:22 am
Judge Gorsuch voted twice to deny contraceptive coverage to women, elevating a corporation’s religious beliefs over women’s health care,” she explained. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:15 pm
The Alliance for Justice criticized Gorsuch as a “disastrous choice,” arguing that he would “put the agenda of powerful special interests ahead of the rights of everyday people,” while the National Partnership for Women and Families lambasted the nomination as an “affront to all who care about women’s health and rights and about stopping discrimination. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:35 am
That means that longstanding precedent, such as Roe v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 5:06 pm
– Roe v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 5:09 pm
It is a false choice - it is really security v security. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
Supreme Court’s March 2015 holding in Young v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am
An early morning jog took me past fishermen, runners, walkers, bikers, and a couple of middle-aged women performing Tai Chi in bright pink traditional Chinese clothing. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
So the choice of topics and the organization of the chapters flowed quite naturally from that experience. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
” More coverage relating to Monday’s ruling in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 9:38 am
” [1] See “Five EEOC Initiatives to Monitor on the Agency’s Golden Anniversary” (June 22, 2015) (noting EEOC’s increased emphasis on transgender protections), available at http://www.ebglaw.com/news/five-eeoc-initiatives-to-monitor-on-the-agencys-golden-anniversary/. [2] Lusardi v. [read post]
Statement by Zeid Ra'ad al Hussein on the Opening of the 32nd Session of the UN Human Rights Council
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
Especially when they are poor – as they disproportionately are – African Americans are more likely to be exposed to violence and crime, less likely to achieve a decent education and will have fewer employment opportunities, receive less adequate health care and face more violent interactions with the police. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 3:54 pm
Mr X’s physical presentation and confusion were further indications that his mental health condition may not have been as stable as assumed and that he might require care support. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm
The sources were so impeccable that we had no choice to run the story in the way we did. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:41 am
Indeed, those payments “are not a group health plan benefit,” at all. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 6:21 am
Roy and Lyng v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
Coverage comes from Bill Mears and Fox News, while Leslie Griffin previews the case at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, arguing that, if the Court were to “rule that courts must defer to such bans, it will certainly have profound implications for women’s health and safety. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 11:15 am
When Congress in 2010 passed the mandate as part of the ACA, it ordered the government to provide “preventive care” for women, but did not spell that out, leaving it to government agencies. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
