Search for: "A v. X, Y, and Z"
Results 121 - 140
of 298
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2013, 4:33 am
Tuesday, Ben bemoaned the state of drone-themed humor in the New York Times, and followed it up yesterday morning with a tale of national security parody gone awry. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 11:41 pm
If the two values are equal, the Z flag is set to 1, otherwise it is set to 0. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
El promedio en Sudamérica es de 21 homicidios x 100 mil habs. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm
There (at [165]), the judge imagined a scenario where ‘X tells an assembly of people at a meeting that he has evidence that Y has murdered Z, his wife, who has been missing. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 8:37 am
(Julieta Prandi, Sofi Zámolo y Jimena Capristo lo hicieron)Es decir, yo podrÃa conseguir que Google no incluya los resultados que me vinculen con un sitio x, pero no puedo pedirle que excluya mi nombre de todos sus relevamientos. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:41 pm
Regular readers of the blog will recall that X and Y v LB Hounslow (above) was appealed to the European Court of Human Rights (Application no. 32666/10 by X,Y and Z against the United Kingdom) as permission to appeal to the House of Lords was refused. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:47 am
As I’ll show, United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 7:15 am
It leases two trucks from DBE Firm Y and six trucks from non–DBE Firm Z. [read post]
21 May 2008, 5:56 am
" You know the drill: If courts strike down x law regulating sexual conduct, then it will be logically impossible to avoid striking down y, z, a, b, and c laws. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 5:44 am
” For more and registration information see: The Truth About Privacy ____________________ For more information about our regulatory law services contact us: contact For more regulatory law updates follow us on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney Preferences Preferences Preferences § 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 - = Backspace Tab q w e r t y u i o p [ ] Return capslock a s d f g h j k l ; ‘ \ shift ` z x c v b n m , . / shift English … [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Jump to County: A-B C D-G H-K L-M O-S T-W Jump to City: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 10:56 am
In Box v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 3:56 pm
In addition, the following Ridgewood Energy funds may not have been suitable for investors: Ridgewood Energy Fund I Ridgewood Energy Fund J Ridgewood Energy Fund K Ridgewood Energy Fund L Ridgewood Energy Fund M Ridgewood Energy Fund N Ridgewood Energy Fund O Ridgewood Energy Fund P Ridgewood Energy Fund Q Ridgewood Energy Fund R Ridgewood Energy Fund R Ridgewood Energy Fund S Ridgewood Energy Fund T Ridgewood… [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 8:52 am
In Benz v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:19 am
Allen Rutberg Exhibit W Wild News: 2013 Update on Nonlethal Sterilization Exhibit X Record of Decision, May 2012 Exhibit Y Minutes of Science Team, March 2006 Exhibit Z Fertility Proposal from The Humane Society of the United… [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
First Letter Last Name Division / Judge Floor Courtroom G, 0, S, U Division A — Greco 2nd 20 B, F, P Division B — Myers 1st Floor 12 D, M, N, X, Y Division C — Farr 2nd 24 C, K, R Division D — Lefler 2nd 23 H, L, W Division E — Taylor 2nd 22 A, E, J,… [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
Ditto, Buckman – indeed, the explicit text of §337(a)’s prohibition of prvate enforcement is a fortiori from Armstrong, under the same reasoning.The Court’s second reason is why medical device plaintiffs shouldn’t be allowed to enforce vague FDA Current Good Manufacturing Practices that do nothing more than state that the defendant should adopt some sort of process for doing X, Y, or Z: Such vague standards are “judicially… [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:55 am
Plea bargains are hammered out between prosecutors and defense attorneys and usually involve some level of compromise, i.e., you drop x-y-z felony charges, and we'll plead guilty to this lower, misdemeanor charge. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:45 am
Veera v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 5:58 pm
In fact little or no justification is offered by the Commission for this conclusion.Kerkhoven again arose for consideration, however, within the context of X, Y & Z v United Kingdom (1997). [read post]
