Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 121 - 140
of 11,570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
This checklist highlights requirements for appealing a trademark refusal issued by an examining attorney of the U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 8:30 am
In this article, we will examine some of the reasons why OHAO Michigan driver’s license appeals may be particularly challenging, as well as what you can do to restore your driving privileges. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 6:29 am
The Board of Appeal also had the following concern regarding the practise of using the description to interpret the claims: "Systemically interpreting the claims for the purpose of assessing the requirement of patentability [...] considering the description runs the risk of reading additional limitations into the claims [...] [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 8:44 am
To increase the opportunity for a successful outcome, our legal counsel will determine if any errors were made by the opposing legal counsel, examine statements made by law enforcement and witnesses, and review all evidence that was introduced throughout the trial. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 8:03 am
There are four levels of appeal: Reconsideration: At this stage, your case will be reviewed by a different SSA examiner than the one who reviewed your initial application. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:33 pm
No, the Examiner had to read it even broader than this, and say that reflection wasn't limited to light, but also included reflecting flying debris! [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm
Read about the key to winning your license appeal. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 1:05 am
It is possible that some Boards of Appeal and Examiners were unaware, prior to the reaction to T 1989/18, of the depth of feeling by EPO users on the issue of description amendments. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 4:16 pm
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has held that the focus must be on the claimed invention; the examiner cannot focus on substitutions between the claims and the prior art. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 10:20 am
Continue reading [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 10:31 pm
… Continue Reading . [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 4:10 pm
The basic procedural setup in the case: Examiner twice rejected claims as obvious and Applicant appealed to PTAB. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
" The Examiner read this on pixels in different images, and the Applicant argued it was limited to processing pixels in the same image. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:19 pm
The CSC requires that Appellants submit the notice of disqualification sent to them by the DCAS Commissioner or other examining agency when filing an appeal. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
Board of Dental Examiners of Alabama to read the entire decision. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:43 pm
Continue reading The post Washington Court Examines Sufficiency of Evidence for Firearm Enhancement appeared first on Tacoma Criminal Lawyer Blog. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:11 am
" I've been following this case since the appeal was filed, and have read the briefs to the Federal Circuit (available from Westlaw or Lexis) as well as most of the file history (on PAIR: Appl. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:16 am
(click on photo for larger picture)The Board cited its recent ruling in In re Rainier Ent., 2019 USPQ2d 463361, *3 (TTAB 2019): "because Applicant failed to address the [specimen refusal] both before the Examining Attorney and in its appeal brief, dismissal of the appeal is appropriate. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:52 am
Click here to read the full opinion in Brownfield v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 9:35 am
A representative claim on appeal read: 1. [read post]
