Search for: "A.E. V. STATE" Results 121 - 140 of 190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
In Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA, [2014] EUECJ C-98/13 (06 February 2014), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) held that a pirated good is distributed in a member State when it is purchased online from a non-member State and shipped from another non-member State into a member State. [read post]
16 May 2014, 3:50 am
On May 25, 2011, the Pennsylvania State Police conducted a planned traffic stop of Freed. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:03 am by Jeremy
Today was the day that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave judgment in Case C‑351/12, OSA – Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. v Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně a.s., a reference for a preliminary issue from a Czech court, the Krajský soud v Plzni. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:12 am by Laura Sandwell
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland), heard 22 – 23 January 2014. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:22 pm
Challinor, The Decision of the English High Court in Rogers & Anor v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 6:56 am
  Today we report that this latter issue may be headed back to the Third Circuit yet again.Yesterday, the court in A.S. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 7:58 am by Gilles Cuniberti
On March 14th, 2013, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered its judgment in Ceská spontelna, a.s. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 6:08 am by John Wileur
In a recent judgment (Case C-68/12 Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky v Slovenská sporitel’ňa a.s.), the Court of Justice held that the fact that the undertaking that is being affected by an anticompetitive agreement might be operating illegally on the market is irrelevant for the application of Article 101 TFEU. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 8:41 am by Gilles Cuniberti
In a judgment of November 17, 2011, the first chamber of the European Court of Justice ruled in Hypotecní banka a.s. v Lindner (case C-327/10) that defendants with unknown domicile are domiciled at their last known domicile for the purpose of the Brussels I Regulation. [read post]