Search for: "ANDREWS v. AC"
Results 121 - 137
of 137
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
U.S. and Barber v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:10 pm
Andrew Henley v Shelly Bloom [2010] EWCA Civ 202 This was a second appeal to the Court of Appeal of a first instance decision that Mr Henley's claim for disrepair against his former landlord, Ms Bloom was an abuse of process, the first appeal to a Circuit judge having been dismissed. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:10 pm
Andrew Henley v Shelly Bloom [2010] EWCA Civ 202 This was a second appeal to the Court of Appeal of a first instance decision that Mr Henley's claim for disrepair against his former landlord, Ms Bloom was an abuse of process, the first appeal to a Circuit judge having been dismissed. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
He also pointed out that the claimant’s reliance only on the front page of the newspaper and not on the article in Sports Section was contrary to the principle in Charleston v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([1995] 2 AC 65) – that a claim for libel could not be founded on a headline or photograph in isolation from the related text. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
Andrews, Kenneth R. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:43 am
V. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 6:39 am
Ware will use the same ace lawyer he had on appeal....Lawyers: Ulysses Thomas Ware (pro se); AUSAs Nicholas Goldin and Andrew Fish [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(West Springfield, MA; Vladimir Zubik, President) Ace Realty Development, Inc. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:54 am
Erickson v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
The position was: (a) that public law defences based on the alleged irrationality of a decision to seek possession could be raised as a defence in the county court - Wandsworth LBC v Winder [1985] AC 461 (b) that Article 8 could not be relied upon to defeat a proprietary or contractual right to possession - Harrow BC v Qazi [2004] 1 AC 983 (c) that decision had been doubted by the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in Connors v UK [2005] 40… [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 3:45 pm
Kay v Lambeth LBC [2006] 2 AC 465 made clear that it was only an exceptional case where domestic law would not provide sufficient protection for Art. 8 purposes. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:29 pm
V. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
DiMarzio Newmark Knight Frank Capital Group Investment Sales Broker 1 Edward Lombardo Pacific National Bank Commercial Real Estate Finance 3 helen anderson Coldwell Banker Hunt Kennedy Brokerage - Residential 2 Mark Stempel The Riese Organization Vice President of Real Estate 2 Derek Dizhi Huang City Link Realty Inc Associate Broker 3 Ryland Mennell America's Realty LLC Brokerage - Residential 2 Charles Zivancev Corcoran Sales 3 Terry Lawler … [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
Box 7788 Santa Rosa, CA 95407-0788 Phone: (707) 566-8647 Fax: (707) 586-3279 E-mail: ucpnb@sonic.net UCP of the Golden Gate 1970 Broadway, Suite 600 Oakland, CA 94612 Phone: (510) 832-7430 Fax: (510) 839-1329 E-mail: info@ucpgg.org Web: http://www.ucpgg.org UCP of Stanislaus County 1213 13th Street Modesto, CA 95354 Phone: (209) 577-2122 Fax: (209) 577-2392 E-mail: rlonczak@yahoo.com CALIFORNIA STATE RESOURCES AGING The California Association of Area Agencies on Aging (C4A) 980 Ninth Street,… [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:40 am
Panetti v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 5:53 pm
[14] Haas v. [read post]
