Search for: "Access Reports v. Department of Justice, Appellant" Results 121 - 140 of 431
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2020, 8:07 am by Dan Maurer
In Section 540F of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2020, Congress directed the Department of Defense to conduct a feasibility study, and to report the findings of that study, on a potential new “alternative military justice system. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Virginia Law Review Online, John Vlahoplus weighs in on Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 7:01 am by Brianne Gorod and Ashwin Phatak
Mazars, as well as an amicus brief on behalf of former Department of Justice officials in support of the respondents in Trump v. [read post]
Not only would the WMA abolish covenants not to compete nationwide, outside of the extremely narrow exceptions highlighted above, but it would also provide the Department of Labor (DOL) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) with broad enforcement power. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:44 am
Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division) explained that there is a sea change from the previous view at the DOJ. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Google is planning to limit advertisers’ access to personal data to address user privacy concerns. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 4:29 am by Apostolos Anthimos
The proportionality principle should be interpreted in a twofold fashion: It is true that high costs may hinder effective access to Justice according to Article 6.1 ECHR and Article 20 of the Greek Constitution. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm by John Elwood
Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am by Steve Lubet
Even after the blow-by-blow, we are left wondering why Roberts departed from his conservative colleagues in the ACA case. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am by Margaret Taylor
The first type—an assertion of presidential communications privilege—represents the core of executive privilege that was first recognized in U.S. v. [read post]