Search for: "Alexander's Inc." Results 121 - 140 of 401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2020, 9:35 am by William Ford, Matt Gluck
The committee will hear testimony from Alexander Gates, a senior advisor in the Energy Department's Office of Policy for Cybersecurity, Energy Security and Emergency Response; Joseph McLelland, the director of the Office of Energy Infrastructure Security at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; Steve Conner, the president and CEO of Siemens Energy, Inc.; and Thomas O'Brien, the senior vice president of PJM International. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Here's another guest post this time by Clem C. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:00 am by WIMS
EPA erred in approving California's State Implementation Plans. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 6:02 am by Brennan W. Bolt
American's Unions Likely to Reject Contracts: Mitchell Schnurman of the Start-Telegram reports that American Airlines' pilots, mechanics and flight attendants will reject the contracts the employer and unions reached last week. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 5:44 am
"I'd rather pay for a half hour of wisdom from a partner who will just give you the answer rather than a first-year associate who will spend 10 hours on the Internet doing research and then write a lengthy memo," said Emory's Alexander. [read post]
17 May 2007, 5:45 am
More on COMSTAC's work to come. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
The issues at hand are whether or not Nichols' claim under the crime victim's statute is barred by the statute of limitations, and whether or not a jury trial was required on the amount of damages under the crime victim's statute. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 9:34 am
NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 43, 111 S.Ct. 2123, 115 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991) (holding that a court may assess attorney's fees when a party has " 'acted in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reasons.' " ( citing Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 5:33 am
NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 43, 111 S.Ct. 2123, 115 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991) (holding that a court may assess attorney's fees when a party has " 'acted in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reasons.' " ( citing Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. [read post]