Search for: "Ali v. Wells" Results 121 - 140 of 642
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2017, 7:00 am by Sarah Grant
Furthermore, the Abu Ali case provided an example of how a witness deposition could be conducted remotely, suggesting that al-Darbi could be deposed again for trial even from Saudi Arabia. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 6:49 pm
  "In light of the inappropriate remarks by IJ Vomacka - which included gratuitous comments on the petitioner's sexuality, as well as unfounded speculations about homosexuals in general - we believe the appropriate course is to grant the petition for review, vacate the BIA's decision, and remand this case for a rehearing before a new IJ," wrote Circuit Judge Guido Calabresi for the court in Ali v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 7:10 am
POTTER, POSTMASTER GEN. | Questions Presented 06-1346 ALI, AHMED V. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 2:31 am by INFORRM
In finding for the Claimant as to meaning Nicol J applied the well-established principles from Jeynes v News Magazines [2008] EWCA Civ 130, considering the meaning a hypothetical reasonable reader would take from the words complained of. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
We say "allegedly" because, whilst Herrmann can blame being out of pocket if he wants, Bexis (although likewise at ALI) doesn't rely upon that excuse. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
The same appears to be true in the case of Merck v PrimeCrown case [(1997) F.S.R. 237]. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  Toner, 732 P.2d at 305-11 (citing Kearl seventeen times, as well as three other California cases). [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:49 am
Here's a post from recent guest Kat Suleman Ali on a topic that touches the heart of patent protection.A test-drive for the Unified Patent Court: Part VI At the hearingMore of the same from Bristows. [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:36 pm by Josh Blackman
Supreme Court denied cert in Abdul Razak Ali v Biden, a Guantanamo due-process case. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 1:13 pm by Robert Chesney
In a 13-page opinion made public today (but dated May 23, 2011), Judge Lamberth in al-Hajj v. [read post]