Search for: "All ACS Staff in the Office"
Results 121 - 140
of 231
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2015, 6:36 am
Merpel wonders:Did the AC delegates approve the EPO's new regime because similar provisions already apply in their own national IP offices? [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market is to be re-branded as the "European Union Intellectual Property Office" [for real, see Katpost here!]. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
* Not all creators of musical content are treated equally: the fate of the lyricist? [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
May you, and indeed all our readers, have a great Easter! [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:07 am
Conflicts of interest of AC members. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 9:58 am
Merpel is pleased to see that the AC is at last starting to address the crisis in staff relations that has developed in recent years and which has come to a head in recent months.While nothing is promised other than a kick-off meeting, the intention would appear to be to formally recognise the staff union, SUEPO. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:56 am
The IPKat blog (or at least one of its authors) has written an open letter to AC members, and I agree with its substance.The AC will do all that it can to create the appearance of "business as usual," as it tried in December. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 5:01 pm
This being so, Merpel takes this opportunity to write an open letter to the Administrative Council (AC), which has responsibility for supervising the operations of the Office, in an attempt to articulate with the utmost clarity -- and without pointing any fingers of blame in any particular direction -- in the hope that it will help the AC's members to focus with greater facility on the matters that appear to her to be most in need of their attention. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 3:11 pm
In the few months before President Obama took office, the economy was in free fall—we had lost roughly two million jobs. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 3:11 pm
In the few months before President Obama took office, the economy was in free fall—we had lost roughly two million jobs. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 8:02 am
The Serbian delegation likewise congratulated the Office, its President and all EPO staff on the excellent results achieved across the board. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
", said Muriel, but it was to no avail ...In case you thought this weblog was only interested in the goings-on at the European Patent Office, here's proof to the contrary effect. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:01 pm
A reasonable observer would have a justified suspicion that he might be influenced in his review of administrative decisions taken by the Office given that he was involved intimately in the management of the Office. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:06 am
These are troubled times indeed in the annals of the European Patent Office. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:29 am
The current ongoing controversy over the (mis)governance of the European Patent Office (EPO) Boards of Appeal is due to come before the Administrative Council (AC) when it next meets on 25 March. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:06 am
In one brief, the prosecution say, Jordan Barber advised all MOD staff not to say anything about the private life of an army officer as this would breach his right to confidentiality, yet at the same time she was speaking to the Sun – leading to a story entitled “Mucky Major and his swinging Mrs”. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 9:47 pm
The AC resolved at its last meeting to set up a disciplinary committee, presumably to consider the case of the Board of Appeal member. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
It covers topics such as staff unrest, union representation, and the independence of the Boards of Appeal.* Can You Make a Porcelain Sculpture Out of a Sow’s Ad? [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
However, to be successful in social media, there are a few basics all Essential Solution clients need to "ace" on their monthly Marketing Report. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 2:24 am
So for the time between the suspension taking effect and the AC endorsing it, it appears to me that the removal from office had no legal basis whatsoever--at least none that I'm aware of.But if this is all about Articles 10 and 11, why does the AC emphasize Rule 23? [read post]
