Search for: "Allen v. Public Service Co." Results 121 - 140 of 205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2011, 7:47 pm by Frank Pasquale
On November 22, 2010, the Department of Health and Human Services released its interim final rule implementing the requirements of the new section 2718 of the Public Health Services Act (added by section 10101 of the Affordable Care Act), entitled, “Bringing Down the Cost of Health Care Coverage. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
    This is my sixth Blawg Review (One co-hosted with Colin Samuels of Infamy or Praise). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:26 am by John Elwood
United States, 09–1395, and Allen v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:22 pm by INFORRM
There have been a number of posts  about the Jameel jurisdiction to strike out/stay  and a number of recent decisions Ronaldo v Telegraph [2010] EWHC 2710 (QB) and Mardas v v New York Times Co [2009] EMLR 8. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:04 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
At BlawgIT, Brett Trout writes about the AMP v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am by Anna Christensen
Amicus brief for the Center for Family Policy and Practice, et al.Amicus brief of the Constitution ProjectBrief of South Carolina Department of Social Services in oppositionBrief of Rebecca Price in oppositionPetitioner's reply Title: Archstone Multifamily Series I Trust v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
In inspections, the EPA said it found violations by Fafard, FRE Building Co. and Benchmark Engineering Corp. at sites in Holliston, Natick, Uxbridge, Milford, Marlborough and elsewhere. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
He has mentored Chicago Public Schools students including co-leading the University of Chicago-Kenwood Academy program for academic exploration. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am by Stephen Page
By virtue of Section 32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 :-(i) “In an Act, a reference to a de facto partner is a reference to either one of two persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis who are not married to each other or related by family;(v) For sub-section (1) – (a) the gender of the persons is not relevant…. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:31 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
  True, Kagan’s public service and administrative record likely would count favorably for an appointment (and many Deanships will await Kagan if her current ambitions disappoint) but the net scholarship now is light. [read post]