Search for: "Alls v. Curry"
Results 121 - 140
of 380
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
“Curry favour with Donald Trump'” by granting trade mark rights… seriously? [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 10:17 am
Have I been mistaken all these years? [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
” Wednesday’s oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 8:31 am
Liberty Credit Services v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:08 am
Links to all previous editions are available in our SCOTUSwiki archive.? [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
” Segal v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 12:27 pm
In his view, this is best achieved through the established test in R v Collins, [1987] 1 SCR 265, 308. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 12:13 pm
And Napear v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:51 pm
And indeed, nearly 15 years later, the Connecticut Supreme Court, in Curry v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
* Benedict Cumberbatch and all those naughty theatre goers: can performers' rights be of any help? [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm
” (Judicial Watch, through separate litigation (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:25 pm
Curry (Ill. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 9:31 am
If they do hold all of the fantasy providers hostage, demanding licensing fees, wouldn't you think Congress, many of whom play fantasy baseball, might find that problematic? [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:03 am
Monnin signed all three, and was given copies of each. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:15 pm
As we have documented elsewhere, since the Supreme Court’s early 2018 decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 8:01 am
Curry expires. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 am
Never miss out with Never Too LateToo busy to keep up with all the IPKat posts last week? [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:05 pm
Curry, 538 F.3d 718, 727 (7th Cir. 2008). [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 4:01 am
In Cordell Marble Falls, LLC v Kelly 2021 NY Slip Op 00833 [191 AD3d 760] February 10, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department, the Court writes: “Under Judiciary Law § 487 (1), an attorney who “[i]s guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party” is liable to the injured party for treble damages (see Shaffer v Gilberg, 125 AD3d 632, 636 [2015]; Curry… [read post]
