Search for: "Alvarado v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2013, 6:51 am by Joy Waltemath
Here, the court concluded that the purposes of the FLSA were not undermined by the conclusion that the employer’s compensation system was based on a commission (Alvarado v Corporate Cleaning Service, Inc, November 18, 2013, Chang, E). [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:15 am by Don Cruse
STATE OF TEXAS, No. 14-0226 Disposed on orders list of May 8, 2015 CITY OF DALLAS v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 11:36 am by Anthony Zaller
Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680, 692, 66 S.Ct. 1187, 90 L.Ed. 1515 (1946), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in IBP, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 4:09 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The People argue that this case is governed by C.P.L § 400.15 (7)(b), which provides that a defendant who fails to challenge the prior felony at the time of his sentencing waives the issue akin to People v Alvarado and People v Odom. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 10:50 am by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
Yesterday, the California Supreme Court ruled that an employer must calculate the regular rate of pay by dividing the employee’s total compensation by the number of nonovertime hours an employee worked during the pay period, rather than the total number of hours the employee worked, including overtime hours (Alvarado v Dart Container Corporation of California). [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Laura Valade
First, they argued her conduct did not rise to the level of “the most egregious conduct involving a corruption of the judicial process itself,” citing Alvarado v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Senator Ralph Alvarado has won a lawsuit against his former political rival Senator Palmer relating to a campaign ad the former Senate Minority Leader ran against his opponent. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Like the original Brookings report, I collected data on sextortion occurring both within and outside of the United States. [read post]
The rate of pay required for non-exempt employees is the regular rate during the pay period the leave is taken if the employer uses the workweek method, or alternatively the employer can use a 90-day lookback for determining the average regular rate, that is generally the same as with the normal state paid sick leave law (unless the employer has any flat-sum bonuses involved, in which case the employer will need to use the Alvarado-method of calculating the regular rate, as… [read post]