Search for: "Amendment to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure" Results 121 - 140 of 528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Dawn Zoldi
RDQ alleged that the rule is a violation of the Fourth Amendment because it allows warrantless tracking in a backyard. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 10:45 am
That amendment [Article X, Section 25 of the Florida Constitution or "Amendment 7"] allows patients access to records relating to medical mistakes by health care providers. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 10:12 pm
This is the dynamic we're all used to: the operation of the Fourth Amendment's exclusionary rule.There is another, less well-known dynamic, one that arises under Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 7:53 am by Juan C. Antúnez
In other words, according to the Florida Bar’s white paper, “the categories of evidence permitted are ‘summary judgment evidence’ (as defined in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(c))” as well as “live witness testimony. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
SC07-2138 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
SC07-2138 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am by Maureen Johnston
Alabama, agency revision of interpretative rules under the Administrative Procedure Act, and the role of judges in assessing the factual basis for expert testimony. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm by Law Lady
ALFONSO SILVA, Appellee. 1st District.Civil procedure -- Default -- Vacation -- A trial court's failure to make oral or written findings in support of an order vacating a default judgment supports reversal only where the record does not contain any facts to support that decision -- Neither Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b), Florida Supreme Court, nor Fourth District Court of Appeal has imposed any requirement that a trial court must make oral… [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
Otherwise, bring tissues as you read how an appellate court remixes the rule of law to rationalize government censorship. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:40 am
Because the court did not explicitly balance the interests of the parties as required by the Federal Criminal Procedure Rule 32.1, the parole revocation was reversed. 8. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:21 am by David Garcia and Joseph Antel
The court suggested that Appellants might have better fortunes filing a new application, and seeking review of its denial in state court based on the procedural and substantive guarantees of state administrative law or, alternatively, under Kentucky’s constitution. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:49 pm
http://www.oranous.com/innocence/MichaelRivera/replybriefRivera.htm IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 05-1873 MICHAEL RIVERA, Appellant, v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Epps, No. 0860652 In an Eight Amendment challenge to lethal injection as the method of execution for two death-row inmates, rulings that the applicable statute of limitations barred plaintiffs' section 1983 action and grant of summary judgment to defendant are affirmed where: 1) under Wilson v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:38 am by Timothy P. Flynn
In the wake of a pair of SCOTUS decisions, Graham vs Florida, and more recently, Miller vs Alabama, holding that state juvenile lifer statutes violate the 8th Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment, U.S. [read post]