Search for: "American Alternative Insurance v. American Protection Insurance" Results 121 - 140 of 507
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
Americans say in surveys they accept the technology’s encroachment because it often feels like something else: a trade-off of future worries for the immediacy of convenience, comfort and ease. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
Substantiation – The employer must have reasonable procedures in place for verifying and substantiating enrollment in individual health insurance coverage. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:30 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Judge King's dissent begins: Any American can choose not to purchase health insurance without legal consequence. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Since the Supreme Court of Canada decided Rocket v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:34 am by Ben
House of Representatives HAS voted 410-6 in favor of the Copyright Alternative in Small-Claims Enforcement Act of 2019, or CASE Act. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
One leading treatise goes so far as to describe the two claims as “alternative ‘grounds’ of recov­ery for a single [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm by MOTP
Under such circumstances, there was no showing of acceptance by conduct as an alternative to acceptance by signature. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:06 am by David A. Martin
In Part V of the census opinion, the chief justice found a way to provide a unique check here. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Maynard, where it was likened to “a virtual necessity for most Americans. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
It is sponsored by the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics & Loyola University Chicago School of Law. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:31 am by Kellie McTammany
The Trump administration has been taking steps on its own to foster alternative insurance that would be less expensive because it does not have certain ACA requirements. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:15 pm
In 2014, Justice Kennedy remarked on the role of disparate impact in Texas DHCA v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized employee organization… [read post]