Search for: "American Auto Protection, LLC" Results 121 - 137 of 137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2009, 8:39 am
Most vehicles currently being driven by American consumers were not designed to operate on ethanol blends greater than E10. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
The collapse of the subprime mortgage market, the ensuing credit crisis, the demise of several major investment banks and, perhaps most of all, the Madoff case led to a loss of confidence in the agency’s ability to protect investors. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
– Meeting, Geneva, 13 July (WIPO) Australia APO: No inventive step: Electrowatt Technology Innovation Corp v ABB Inc (IPRoo) American pop star Katy Perry sends cease and desist letter to Katie Perry clothing label (The IP Factor) IP Australia: Changes to the administrative instructions under the PCT – filing and processing sequence listings effective 1 July (IPRoo) PCT rule changes and other patents regulation changes (IPRoo) Amendments to Trade Marks Regulations… [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:28 am
" The Washington Times also ran the story.From the American Association for Justice news release. [read post]
15 May 2009, 1:03 am
Madoff Investment Securities LLC, told reporters Thursday that the "enormously time-consuming" and painstaking process of reconstructing the books and records of Madoff's firm "from scratch" continues. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Afro-IP)   Peru Peru approves ratification of PCT (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property)   Philippines Government says Philippines should be removed from US government watch list, despite claims from American lobby groups (ContentAgenda)   Poland DIX versus DIX or judgment versus judgment (Class 46) PPO’s invalidates figurative mark belonging to FIRMA BATCZEW Stanislaw Komperda incorporating elements similar to EU flag (Class 46)  … [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
Piester, LLC (11-CA-21531; 353 NLRB No. 33) Newberry, SC Sept. 30, 2008. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
: (IP ThinkTank), (further discussion from IAM and e^(ip)) Illusory world of trade secret protection – Discussion of S Schreter’s article ‘Inside entrepreneurship: Patent protection isn’t only option’: (IPBiz)   Global – Copyright Illegal art: (Patry Copyright Blog),     Events 1-3 June: ACC Europe 2008 annual conference ‘Becoming a global legal manager: Developing the skills you will… [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Order to transfer myspace.co.uk to MySpace overturned: (Out-Law), (IMPACT), New branding scheme for Ethiopian coffees: (Afro-IP), (IP finance), (IPKat), USPTO to appeal Tafas/GSK v Dudas: (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (PLI), (Patent Baristas), (Managing Intellectual Property), (IP Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Ladas & Parry), … [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (IAM)DSS case: Europe’s patent demise: (IPEG),EU calls on US to fulfill TRIPS obligations re copyright: (The IP Factor),How to safeguard unprotected know-how in FP7 projects: (IPR Helpdesk),European Council calls for a free movement of knowledge: (IPR-Helpdesk),Madrid amendments for double-treatied Union members: (IPKat),Proposed Europe-wide rules governing biometric passports are still unsatisfactory despite some concessions, according to European Data Protection Supervisor:… [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
: (Spicy IP),‘The Good, the Bad and the Ugly II’ – Business, public interest forces and the role of IP: (IP finance),Interview with Debra Harry, Indigenous People’s Council on Biocolonialism: (Intellectual Property Watch),WIPO Committee on Development and IP wraps up inaugural meeting: (WIPO),Five IP policy questions for WIPO DG Candidates: (Intellectual Property Watch),IP strategy for R&D: keep records like Thomas Edison: (Lightbulb),New kid on the… [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 2:26 pm
NLRB Law Memo 01/18/2008 by LawMemo - First in Employment Law. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
NLRB Law Memo 10/09/2006 by LawMemo - World's Best. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 11:06 am
He further wrote that as argued by the General Counsel, "the Board has found that a striker's use of the most vile and vulgar language, including racial epithets, does not deprive him of the protection of the Act, so long as those actions do not constitute a threat. [read post]