Search for: "Americans for Clean Energy v. EPA" Results 121 - 140 of 315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2015, 9:03 am by WIMS
EPA & National Mining Association v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:36 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> NRDC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 8:36 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Organized Village of Kake v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:57 am by WIMS
Leads Nation on EPA's Energy Star Top Cities List. . . [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
EPA, which said that the, before regulating mercury under the Clean Air Act, the agency must complete a cost-benefit analysis and find that the regulation “is necessary and appropriate. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm by Ken Alex
EPA, the Supreme Court said this: The dissent also cites our decision in American Elec. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:36 pm by WIMS
    The Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) said EPA's proposed rule for new national clean air standards for oil and natural gas will reduce harmful air pollution, protect public health and the environment, and prevent the waste of a valuable domestic energy source. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm by Monika Ehrman
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, which amended the Clean Air Act, established and expanded the RFS. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm by WIMS
Inc., American Electric Power Service Corp., Cinergy Corp., Southern Co. and Xcel Energy Inc.] [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 8:16 am
From April 21-24, the House Energy &amp; Commerce Committee, Chaired by Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA) and its Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, Chaired by Representative Ed Markey (D-MA) held four days of must-see hearings on the American Clean Energy Security Act Of 2009. [read post]
15 May 2009, 8:20 am
Among other items the Republican bill would amend the Clean Air Act to overturn Massachusetts v. [read post]