Search for: "Antoine Jones"
Results 121 - 140
of 169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2011, 11:12 am
What has been taken from Antoine Jones, the lawyer would say, was “the data” about his movements, and that is what he had not chosen to expose to the police. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:55 am
The lawyers for accused drug trafficker Antoine Jones, who had a GPS device put on his Jeep, say that the device violates Jones’s Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and that his property rights were violated. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 5:21 am
The lawyers for accused drug trafficker Antoine Jones, who had a GPS device put on his Jeep, say that the device violates Jones’s Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and that his property rights were violated. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:15 am
JONES, ANTOINE 10-8145 SMITH, JUAN v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:15 am
Representing a District of Columbia man, Antoine Jones, whose conviction for drug trafficking was overturned by a lower court, will be Stephen C. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:03 pm
Representing a District of Columbia man, Antoine Jones, whose conviction for drug trafficking was overturned by a lower court, will be Stephen C. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 8:23 pm
In Jones, the facts are as follows: in 2004, a Safe Streets Task Force of the FBI and the Metropolitan Police Department began investigating Antoine Jones, owner of a Washington, D.C. nightclub, for cocaine trafficking. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 8:01 am
His Yale Law Journal article Fourth Amendment Seizures of Computer Data was cited by respondent Antoine Jones to support the argument that gathering GPS data from a car’s movements constitutes a “seizure. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:02 pm
Antoine Jones later this term. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:56 am
In 2005, police in Maryland attached a GPS device to Antoine Jones' car. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am
The Hill discusses some of the amicus briefs filed recently in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:47 pm
The divided appeals court vacated the life sentence of a man named Antoine Jones, convicted for his alleged role in a drug trafficking conspiracy. [read post]
U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Arguments in Warrantless GPS Surveillance and Tracking Case on November 8
6 Oct 2011, 5:41 am
The police obtained a warrant authorizing placement of a Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) device on a vehicle belonging to defendant Antoine Jone's wife, although the warrant was only good for 10 days. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:13 pm
A federal appeals court had reversed the conviction, saying such monitoring amounted to an illegal search of defendant Antoine Jones in violation of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was “wrong” in August when it reversed the drug dealer’s conviction, which was based on warrants to search and find drugs in the locations where defendant Antoine Jones had traveled. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 11:59 am
The club owner, Antoine Jones, contends that police infringed on his Fourth Amendment rights by placing a GPS device on his Jeep and monitoring his movements for a month. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 2:58 am
The case . . . arose from the investigation of the owner of a Washington nightclub, Antoine Jones, who was suspected of being part of a cocaine-selling operation. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 5:23 am
C. summarized the Jones case this way in their Memorandum Opinion and Order dated August 1,2011 (2011 WL 3332856): Antoine Jones the defendant in the above referenced case was found guilty of a conspiracy to distribute and/or possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of powder cocaine and fifty grams or more of crack cocaine on January 10, 2008. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:22 pm
Jones, the FBI and Washington, D.C., police attached a GPS device to Antoine Jones’ car and tracked his movements continuously for a month. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm
Boldly proclaiming that old constitutional principles do not yield to new waves of technology, but leaving itself chances to make some exceptions, the Supreme Court on Monday flatly barred state legislatures and Congress from trying to shield children from violent video games, took on anew the issue of whether government can protect children from dirty words and adult nudity on TV and radio, and promised a new decision on high-tech police surveillance and its impact on individual privacy. [read post]
