Search for: "Application for Order Compelling Discovery, in Re"
Results 121 - 140
of 457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
Despite these strongly worded prohibitions, the subject discovery order requires Starbucks to rummage through old job applications to locate offenders whose existence otherwise would be hidden from public exposure.Considering the manifest harm and the minimal benefit (all of which are wrapped up in the same legislation), the discovery order cannot possibly pass the Parris balancing test. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:09 am
Any comments addressing systemic issues that are the subject of frequent questions by interested observers should always be understood to defer to specific judicial rulings, if applicable. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 11:20 pm
In re D. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
If not, a little background is in order. [read post]
3 May 2012, 3:00 am
This is why the government cannot be the target of a discovery request brought under the statute (which permits the court to order a “person” to testify or produce documents). [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order denying Cash Biz's motion to compel arbitration and denying Cash Biz's motion to enforce the class action waiver provision. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Res. [read post]
20 May 2008, 4:21 am
And so it seems like a good time to re-post this article. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 1:25 pm
The case is In re: Apache Corp. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:04 pm
The Board denied Defendant Princeton’s motion to compel sweeping e-discovery, observing that in TTAB proceedings “the burden and expense of e-discovery will weigh heavily against requiring production in most cases. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 12:23 pm
[You’re name is Daphne? [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:40 pm
In re: Intuniv Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 1:16-cv-12653-ADB, (D. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 11:24 am
In a one-page order filed by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on August 31 granting allocatur, the Supreme Court noted that it will review the issue of "whether the Superior Court's interpretation of Pa.R.C.P. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 12:13 pm
Tex. 1993) (citing In re Auclair, 961 F.2d 65, 69 (5th Cir. 1992)). [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 12:35 pm
Though the Trustee doubtlessly did not think that, as would occur in a more standard case, “a full and complete record” would include information, on his and SIPC’s motive, that is obtained in discovery, his own statement nonetheless is applicable here. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 7:26 am
Benedict argued that that proceeding was barred by what he referred to as the res judicata effect of the Trademark Office’s rejection of Super’s earlier application to expand its mark. [read post]
1 May 2009, 1:31 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKAlternative Dispute Resolution Order Compelling Arbitration Vacated; Chinese Firm Acted Contrary to Preserve Right to ArbitrateApple & Eve LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
The various motions to seal, compel, enforce, and sanction were filed after the parties had entered into a stipulated protective order. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 5:11 pm
Indeed, the doctrine assumes its application often will be more cumbersome for the party seeking discovery. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 4:46 am
A motion “is an application to the court for a ruling or an order in a pending case. [read post]
