Search for: "Application of Her Majesty The Queen" Results 121 - 140 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2012, 6:30 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
  CRA claimed that s.227(4) of the ITA imposed a trust in favour of Her Majesty on the lien fund in priority to that of the lien claimants. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm by legaleaseckut
Langevin said he is not a lawyer but a private citizen, he mentions, however, have a good experience in applications since the 2000s, indicating that these refer disputes between other four situations: a) the fact that he fell into a trap of misinformation, as a breeding boar he had; b) the fact that his brother [11] has sold his farm without administrator permission; c) the fact that people in authority, for the Queen had been “six false psychologist” on it and have… [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm by legaleaseckut
Langevin said he is not a lawyer but a private citizen, he mentions, however, have a good experience in applications since the 2000s, indicating that these refer disputes between other four situations: a) the fact that he fell into a trap of misinformation, as a breeding boar he had; b) the fact that his brother [11] has sold his farm without administrator permission; c) the fact that people in authority, for the Queen had been “six false psychologist” on it and have… [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 3:05 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Parry & Ors, heard 31 October 2019. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 1:13 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The best way it illustrates this is the call in para 94 to modify the Oath of Citizenship as follows: I swear (or affirm) that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada including Treaties with Indigenous Peoples, and fulfill my duties as a Canadian citizen. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:30 am by Frank Cranmer
The Canterbury Cross is awarded for “outstanding service to the Church of England” and was given to the Queen in recognition and gratitude for Her Majesty’s “unstinting support of the Church throughout her reign” and to mark her Platinum Jubilee year; a specially cast version was made for Her Majesty with platinum inserts in honour of the Platinum Jubilee. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 4:51 am by Tobias Thienel
Thus, Lord Bingham of Cornhill has explained in R v Jones (Margaret) [2006] UKHL 16, [2006] 2 WLR 772, at para. 30, in a passage that could have been tailored to the present case:'Resolution of the charge would (...) call for a decision on the culpability in going to war either of Her Majesty's Government or a foreign government, or perhaps both if the states had gone to war as allies. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by Jeanine Cali
It serves as a reminder of the last invasion by a foreign power, and is also a symbol of our constitutional monarchy as her Majesty the Queen still uses it as one of her official residencies. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:21 am
Unlike most people, who are happy to settle for a knighthood from Her Majesty the Queen or another available member of the royal family, Andrew has received his honour ambitious and fast-growing law firm Wragge & Co. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:37 am by Doorey
However, a recent Ontario case in which s. 24 damages were sought in conjunction with a s.52 declaration of invalidity did not succeed: Canadian Union of Postal Workers v Her Majesty in Right of Canada, 2016 ONSC 418. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Her Majesty’s Attorney-General v BBC [2022] EWHC 1189 (QB) (pdf) relating to the terms of the injunction prohibiting the BBC from identifying “X”, the alleged covert human intelligence source working for MI5. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:41 am by CMS
These are political questions whose resolution must be found in the political arena. 1530: David Johnston QC states the Respondent’s position is that the court should not scrutinise the reason for the advice to Her Majesty because it is “non-justiciable”. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 11:03 am by Patricia Hughes
As noted earlier in these reasons, the appropriate application of accumulated wisdom and inappropriate intrusion of judicial stereotyping is a fine line” that in this case, left the decision open to review (SCJ, para. 24). [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:19 pm by Patricia Hughes
They do object to the requirements in Schedule 5 of the Constitution Act, 1867 (CA, 1867), which reads as follows: I A.B. do swear, That I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 1:45 am by David Pocklington
Order in Council – closure of churchyard Whilst the closure of the churchyard under the Order made by Queen Victoria on 20 March 1857 was undisputed, “the Order proved difficult to locate, which can provide a salutary lesson for PCCs and diocesan registries of the importance of carefully retaining such documents”. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:34 am by David Pocklington
Order in Council – closure of churchyard Whilst the closure of the churchyard under the Order made by Queen Victoria on 20 March 1857 was undisputed, “the Order proved difficult to locate, which can provide a salutary lesson for PCCs and diocesan registries of the importance of carefully retaining such documents”. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:44 am by David Pocklington
Order in Council – closure of churchyard Whilst the closure of the churchyard under the Order made by Queen Victoria on 20 March 1857 was undisputed, “the Order proved difficult to locate, which can provide a salutary lesson for PCCs and diocesan registries of the importance of carefully retaining such documents”. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
They have three parts: (1) law firms can be invested in (owned—up to 49% or 100%) by non-lawyer people and entities; (2) legal services be enabled to be provided with related non-legal services; and, (3) routine legal services be automated by software applications. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The same blog has also published an article on the recent decisions in The Queen on the application of Privacy International v Investigatory Powers Tribunal [2022] EWHC 770 QB and Her Majesty’s Attorney General for England and Wales v British Broadcasting Corporation [2022] EWHC 826 (QB), on the topic of closed judgments. [read post]