Search for: "Arm v. State Bar (1990)" Results 121 - 140 of 166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
While the Supreme Court accepted in Manchester v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45; [2011] HLR 7 that the time had come to welcome proportionality into possession proceedings with open arms and a nice piece of pie, Lord Neuberger MR noted that: "57. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
While the Supreme Court accepted in Manchester v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45; [2011] HLR 7 that the time had come to welcome proportionality into possession proceedings with open arms and a nice piece of pie, Lord Neuberger MR noted that: "57. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:24 am by Eugene Volokh
DM-71 (1991) (concluding such a lease condition is barred by state law).}Illinois allows firearms in public housing, but bans stun guns. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:42 pm
Schwarzenegger, no federal court had invalidated a state law barring same-sex marriage, ever. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Precision Airmotive Corp., 42 P.3d 1071, 1071 (Alaska 2002) (§20); Savage Arms, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
COLA's auditor also stated that Miracle Star did not provide adequate records for the audit, which caused the auditor to be unable to determine if Miracle Star had provided all specific services stated in the contract. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm by Jim Harper
In the late 1990s the Supreme Court held in a series of 5-4 opinions that states have immunity from suits for money judgments in federal court for violation of intellectual property and other statutes. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:18 pm by Lyle Denniston
Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument in Samantar v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 2:52 pm
The February 8, 2010 opinion in Keller v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Kevin's thoughtful presentations might have received more recognition in previous years, but the bar is so high. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Kevin's thoughtful presentations might have received more recognition in previous years, but the bar is so high. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 11:51 am
A ruling changing this “could be the Brown v. [read post]