Search for: "Arthur Andersen"
Results 121 - 140
of 506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2008, 8:47 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, the California Supreme Court reaffirmed California's strong public policy against covenants not to compete. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:43 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, the California Supreme Court reaffirmed California's strong public policy against covenants not to compete. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:59 am
The transcript for the argument in Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 11:21 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal.4th 937 (2008), reaffirmed that employee non-competition agreements are void in California unless they fall within narrow exceptions to Business and Professions Code Section 16600. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 4:23 am
Defense attorneys for Arthur Andersen and New Jersey plaintiff’s lawyer filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the litigation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:04 am
Andersen & Deepak Raju, India’s Initial WTO Disputes—An Analysis in Retrospect Abhijit Das & Jayant Raghuram, One Too Many: Significant Contributions of India to the WTO Dispute Settlement Jurisprudence Arthur E. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 4:00 am
Examples: Arthur Andersen, KPMG (tax shelters), various law firms, lobbyists (Cassidy & Co.), etc. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:21 am
In 2002, Arthur Andersen LLP collapsed in the wake of an obstruction of justice conviction. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 10:42 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal.4th 937 (2008), the California Supreme Court confirmed the viability and breadth of section 16600 and expressly rejected a line of Ninth Circuit cases which had upheld sufficiently narrow restrictive covenants that only barred a party from pursuing a small or limited part of its business. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 6:47 am
Edwards and against Arthur Andersen. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 8:47 am
In the Arthur Andersen case the court held that a reasonable fee must be based on the eight factors set out by the disciplinary rules. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 9:12 am
Supreme Court case, Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 10:30 pm
Arthur Andersen and held that California law prohibits agreements restraining competition, regardless of how narrow or reasonable the restraint may be. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 11:48 am
However, the Arthur Andersen case and now the Fillpoint case make this position a lot less certain, even though they don't specifically overturn Loral corp. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 10:01 pm
This is the fellow who - among other outrageous tactics -- is primarily responsible for prosecuting Arthur Andersen out of business and for destroying the careers of several innocent Merrill Lynch executives in the notoriously misguided Nigerian Barge case. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 8:00 am
He has over 30 years of combined business experience, with Arthur Andersen & Co. (10 years in Washington, D.C., and Italy), as the CFO for 2 public and 2 private high technology companies (13 years), and as a financial consultant to more than 50 companies (over 10 years). [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
Merits briefs for the petitioner are due Monday in Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 9:46 pm
Arthur Andersen, the California Supreme Court reaffirmed the state's strong policy against noncompetition agreements, rejecting the Ninth Circuit's "narrow restraint" exception. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 7:52 am
Weil applied relentlessness and style in covering the likes of Enron and Arthur Andersen. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 8:16 pm
Just one example: Arthur Andersen is in danger of bankruptcy because it’s hemorrhaging clients. [read post]
