Search for: "Atkins v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 289
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2014, 4:45 pm
Cain13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner's penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner's claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
United States, 13-1487, voluntarily turned over to the FBI fifteen firearms while unrelated marijuana charges were pending against him. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner's penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner's claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 7:43 pm
In 2002, in Atkins v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:43 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court decided Hall v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:43 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court decided Hall v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:37 pm
In the 2002 case of Atkins v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 3:17 pm
The appeals court made their decision to follow the holding of Atkins v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 3:31 pm
Atkins. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:28 am
At more than twenty cents, Andrew Suszek criticizes what he describes as the “strong trend among journalists and judges alike in using the” Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 8:02 am
In 2002, in Atkins v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:26 am
District Judge Vaughn Walker striking down California’s ban on same-sex marriage, noting that although the Supreme Court later “chose to speak on gay marriage through a narrower case, ruling only that the federal government must recognize marriages solemnized under state law,” since then the lower courts “have been reading the [United States v.] [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
Lucas (1983) and Schweiker v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
For example, under the doctrine set forth in the 1979 case of United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:55 am
And Wells linked to a District Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:28 am
Rev. 743, 752-53 (2005); see also, e.g., United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:17 am
True enough, when we got the judgment for seven (theoretical) figures in Louis Vuitton v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
United States, and perhaps implicating the twice-relisted Woodward v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
”Because the University of Alabama is a state entity, it cannot be joined in a case in federal court. [read post]
