Search for: "B. Baker"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,649
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2017, 7:54 pm
Sampson of Baker Botts will provide guidance to IP counsel for understanding Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) B-delay possibilities and double patenting, particularly in view of a desire not to lose PTA in an earlier issued patent. [read post]
13 May 2017, 8:47 pm
Sampson of Baker Botts will provide guidance to IP counsel for understanding Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) B-delay possibilities and double patenting, particularly in view of a desire not to lose PTA in an earlier issued patent. [read post]
1 May 2007, 12:12 pm
Dale B. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 2:00 am
Justice Baker of the High Court of Justice Family Division cited the Gard case in making a similar ruling. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:18 pm
Baker McKenzie Sues The IRS! [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:45 pm
David B. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:00 am
Davis, partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and David B. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 5:48 pm
View the article here 09/19/2008 By MAX B. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 2:48 pm
Wayne Drinkwater, Jr. of Bradley, Arant, Rose & White, Adam B. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 8:24 pm
Sampson of Baker Botts will provide guidance to IP counsel for understanding Patent Term Adjustment B-delay possibilities and double patenting, particularly in view of a desire not to lose PTA in an earlier issued patent, and analyze recent court treatment and offer best practices to defeat double patenting rejections, and avoid terminal disclaimers,... [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:45 am
B. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 5:28 am
Baker v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 4:43 pm
The following is a discussion board post from David B. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 8:00 am
The attorneys successfully representing Williams were David B. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:03 am
Baker (left) and NJSBA President Kevin P. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
Baker v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 6:05 am
This is a three-justice review (under V.R.A.P. 9(b)(2) for you citation junkies). [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
Retired employees over age 65, however, were required to enroll in a Medicare Part B program [Part B] and the district reimbursed retirees the cost of Part B coverage. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
Retired employees over age 65, however, were required to enroll in a Medicare Part B program [Part B] and the district reimbursed retirees the cost of Part B coverage. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
Retired employees over age 65, however, were required to enroll in a Medicare Part B program [Part B] and the district reimbursed retirees the cost of Part B coverage. [read post]
