Search for: "B. Lang"
Results 121 - 140
of 861
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2011, 3:10 am
(New requirement of 315 (b)). [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 3:10 am
§ 1.560(b) (”An interview does not remove the necessity for response to Office actions as specified in § 1.111. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
We affirm the trial court's ruling on the basis that the relevant portion of former RCW 9A.44.130(6)(b) is not a "requirement" under former RCW 9A.44.130(1)(a). [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm
lang? [read post]
7 May 2013, 4:10 am
The prohibition of 315(b) is essentially a codification of a laches time bar. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
” Alan Lange & Tom Dawson, Kings of Torts 87 (2d ed. 2010) (quoting convicted former lawyer, Zach Scruggs) Back in the 1980s, I started to see expert witnesses stray into the business of psychoanalysis of corporate defendants. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 5:15 pm
It is shameful… Lawdiva aka Georgialee Lang [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:15 am
§ 315 (b)(1) recites: (b) THIRD-PARTY REQUESTER. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 4:15 am
On the heels of the Track B announcement, the Court issued a second denial of a stay of the patent dispute between VirtualAgility Inc., v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 4:15 am
§ 315(b). [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:10 am
Depending upon the manner in which the case settles, and whether or not the case is before the ITC, a carefully worded consent judgment can be used to trigger 35 USC § 317 (b), effectively forcing the USPTO to vacate the proceeding by operation of estoppel. 35 USC § 317 (b) provides: (b) FINAL DECISION.- Once a final decision has been entered against a party in a civil action arising in whole or in part under section 1338 of title 28, that the… [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 12:00 am
Gabriel, Suzanne Harrington-Steppen, Anna Russell, and Genevieve B. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm
I supplement his sources with the less-covered Seljuq, Mamlūk, and Ottoman-era accounts of punishment that Christian Lange (2012), Carl Petry (2008), and others have collected in their studies. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:35 am
Danicek and the incident at Bar None can be said to engage coverage under clause 2.b. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:10 am
While we believe that § 317(b) is clear, even if it were ambiguous, the Patent Office’s interpretation that § 317(b) does not apply “[i]f there remains any time for an appeal” would be entitled to deference. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:15 am
See, 37 CFR 42.64(b)(1) and (b)(2). [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 1:10 am
Intervening rights are therefore unavailable under § 307(b) as a matter of law. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 3:42 pm
We have a right to know.As Judge Robert B. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
Volume I, Dynamic jurisprudential thought / Charles Mwalimu.Mwalimu, Charles.New York : Peter Lang, c2010.AntitrustKF1649.A2 C49 2009Circuit conflicts in antitrust litigation / John H. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
-> En mi blog: Cómo relanzar la presencia del despacho en Internet http://m.iabogado.com/oanhf -> En el blog de Sevach: Citas bíblicas cruciales para el poder público: a Dios rogando y con el mazo dando http://t.co/vh1SyRN -> Pequeños placeres matutinos. [read post]
