Search for: "B. Thornton" Results 121 - 140 of 245
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2015, 5:00 pm
Additional Resources: 3 arrested in Gadsden home invasion, police say, August 3, 2015, AL.com, William Thornton [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
In fact he was so close to Rees, they even registered companies at the same address in Thornton Heath. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:37 am by SHG
Joe Salazar, a Democrat from Thornton, has introduced House Bill 15-1290, which: would impose up to $15,000 in civil penalties if a law enforcement officer seizes or destroys a citizen’s recording or interferes with someone trying to film them. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:44 am by Bridget Crawford
Below the fold is Version 3.0 of the census of law prof Twitter users. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 9:49 am by Steven Koprince
The GAO’s decision in Oasis Systems, LLC, B-407273.54; B-407273.61; B-407273.64 (June 19, 2014) involved the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:22 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
De interés: Ya disponible planilla para el año contributivo 2013 Descargar calendario contributivo de Puerto Rico 2014 (*.PDF vía Kevane Grant Thornton) Todo patrono que haga pagos de salarios deducirá y retendrá sobre el monto de los salarios una contribución determinada de acuerdo a las tablas de retención que aprobará el Secretario de Hacienda. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Section 1 – Serious harm A statement is no longer defamatory unless a claimant can show that ‘…its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to [his/her] reputation…’  This section builds on the jurisprudence of Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) and is intended to deter trivial claims. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
 Grant Thornton: Huge Boost Ahead for Industrial MarketsU.S. companies will bring production, customer service and IT infrastructure back home, reports tax-advisory firm Grant Thornton. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
But for now, let me discuss the argument that granting such an exemption would violate the Establishment Clause, “[b]ecause exempting large, for-profit corporations from the contraception mandate would significantly burden female employees, along with all the wives and daughters covered by the policies of male employees. [read post]