Search for: "B. v. S."
Results 121 - 140
of 57,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
As relevant here, "CPLR 7511 (b) (1) (iii) permits vacatur of an award where . . . the arbitrator exceeds [their] power" (Matter of Gerber v Goldberg Segalla LLP, 199 AD3d 1354, 1355 [4th Dept 2021]). [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
As relevant here, "CPLR 7511 (b) (1) (iii) permits vacatur of an award where . . . the arbitrator exceeds [their] power" (Matter of Gerber v Goldberg Segalla LLP, 199 AD3d 1354, 1355 [4th Dept 2021]). [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 5:08 am
In Armenta v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 12:00 am
Stay tuned for what’s to come next month! [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
SEC v. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 3:32 pm
This Court may grant Deadspin's motion under Rule 12(b)(6) only if "under no reasona [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 9:41 am
Meza Diaz v. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 9:30 am
Dist. v Town of Southampton, 179 AD3d 929 and Matter of Lepper v Village of Babylon, 190 AD3d 738]. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 9:30 am
Dist. v Town of Southampton, 179 AD3d 929 and Matter of Lepper v Village of Babylon, 190 AD3d 738]. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 7:51 am
Vincent’s School for Boys, Catholic Charities CYO v. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 6:34 am
SEMINAL C ASE LAW ON EMPLOYMENT: BORELLO, MARTINEZ, DYNAMEX § 30 Overview § 31 Borello Case § 32 Martinez Case § 33 Dynamex Case §§ 34-39 Reserved PART V. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 5:24 am
"The Munich Local Division of the Unified Patent Court (‘the Court’) has ruled in Syngenta v. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 2:00 am
b. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 12:00 am
Subchapter V Decision Tracker – Keep up to date on key legal developments, with two new cases in September. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 12:00 am
So far, the FTC has not appealed the Fifth Circuit’s nationwide ban on the rule issued in Ryan v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 9:33 pm
Its majority shareholder was the Defendant (Bank B) who held 99.39% shares. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 5:49 pm
See Skidmore v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 12:56 pm
L., Child Custody, Protection & Support § 35:2-2(b)(3) (2024); see also Lall v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 10:20 am
California Natural Gas Vehicle Coalition v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 9:06 am
As a consequence, Väderstad’s appeals were limited to the question whether the signs lacked distinctive character (Art. 7(1)(b) EUTMR). [read post]