Search for: "BAKER v. US "
Results 121 - 140
of 2,808
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2007, 2:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 10:00 am
According to the court, unlike Baker & Taylor, CompUSA makes use of the goods in Hawaii (Baker & Taylor did not use the books in Hawaii; title passed on the mainland). [read post]
20 May 2014, 9:16 am
But then I found myself reading Marbury v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 2:24 pm
Baker, 554 U. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 6:03 am
[SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses the "Universal Citation. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm
That will take some getting used to. 2. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 6:56 am
Amid the enduring and varied debates about the political question doctrine, motivated by the Supreme Court's 1962 Baker v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:32 pm
In the federal case (Baptiste v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:20 am
Summarizing Judge Leon’s reasons for not following Smith v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 3:16 pm
Following the shocking sight of CAAF holding that NMCCA was too defendant-friendly in Cabrera-Frattini and CAAF's use of Jackson v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:40 am
(Stewart Baker) Conservatives have grown more skeptical of copyright maximalism since SOPA forced newly elected Republicans to choose sides in the copyright wars. [read post]
7 Oct 2017, 8:10 pm
Orion Armon of Cooley LLP, Sarah Guske of Baker Botts LLP, and Miri Beiler of LexisNexis will discuss the following: • The potential impact of the Supreme Court's decision in Oil States • Guidance for how to use IPRs while Oil States is pending • How to leverage PTAB proceedings in district court even if the Supreme Court finds IPRs unconstitutional Those interested in registering for the webinar, can do so here. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:16 pm
In my 2014 post, I noted how Sega put it: “To the extent that a work is functional or factual, it may be copied,Baker v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 5:00 am
But Sega is crystal clear that we do allow interoperability reuse: “To the extent that a work is functional or factual, it may be copied,Baker v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:20 am
On April 4, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Evenwel v. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 7:59 am
Baker-White ruling (involving republishing screenshots of social media posts) and the confusing Woodhull v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
In Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy, the CJEU stated that use that does not create an impression of commercial connection or take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s distinctive character or repute will be considered honest practice. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:33 am
The appeals court disagreed, holding that the text of Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) Section 1514A is not a rule or regulation of the Commission (Baker v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 6:13 am
The Supreme Court has ruled that the Colorado Human Rights Commission denied a baker his religious rights in expressing hostility toward his religious beliefs in the course of determining whether he violated the rights of a gay couple in refusing to bake them a wedding cake.The case is Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 2:44 am
Stewart Baker points to a provision in Congress’s continuing resolution that is the first serious attempt I have seen to punish (as opposed to rail against) China for its cybersecurity practices. [read post]
