Search for: "BORDEN v. STATE"
Results 121 - 140
of 167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2014, 11:20 am
Cir. 2009) (same); In re Borden, 90 F.3d 1570, 1574 (Fed. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm
Borden decision, which involved the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act, and again in its 1945 Georgia v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
Accord Phelps v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 8:22 am
This morning the justices granted a new case, involving the same issue, to replace it: Borden v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
The Feres doctrine, stemming from the 1950 Feres v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 3:43 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Mendoza v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:07 am
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 12:04 pm
Borden, 7How. 1 (1849), when they ask for an advisory opinion, Hayburn’s Case, 2Dall. 409 (1792), see also Clinton v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 9:28 pm
Judge Ho addressed this point in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 6:05 am
Borden v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 10:12 am
Borden, (Tex. 2009)No. 08-0506 (Tex. [read post]
19 May 2022, 5:24 am
State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
Walker-Renshaw of Borden Ladner Gervais LLP presented her perpsective on the 2008 SCC decision, Mustapha v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 6:30 am
Borden, 63 Va. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:57 am
BORDEN, JR. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:15 am
Borden, 7How. 1 (1849), when they ask for an advisory opinion, Hayburn’s Case, 2Dall. 409 (1792), see also Clinton v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 9:22 pm
Judge Ho described it in his United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 8:05 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Borden , No. 08-1625 Sentence for drug crimes is affirmed where the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant a sentence reduction where: 1) defendant's sentence was appropriate based upon his extensive criminal history and the need to protect society; and 2) the court did not erroneously rely upon its earlier decision not to resentence defendant as a the basis for the present denial. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP finance) The UK IP Office issues a Virgin trademark ruling that contrasts the Israel approach (IP Factor) EWHC (Pat): Article 27 (to prevent parallel proceedings in different member states) requires flexible approach to meaning of ‘same parties’: Mölnlycke Health Care AB (MAB), Mölnlycke Health care Limited (MUK) v. [read post]
