Search for: "BROOME v. STATE"
Results 121 - 140
of 187
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2010, 10:42 am
In Broom v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 3:20 pm
Broom v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 12:22 pm
Broom v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:53 am
Waters v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:36 pm
Rehnquist in Herrera v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:56 am
The anatomy of a disputed claim for GML §207-c benefitsParker v Village of Johnson City, 2010 NY Slip Op 50957(U), Decided on May 26, 2010, Supreme Court, Broome County, Ferris D. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:39 am
Alleged abolishment of positions in violation of a provision in a CBA held to be subject to grievance arbitrationMatter of Johnson City Professional Firefighters Local 921 v Village of Johnson City, 2010 NY Slip Op 02890, Decided on April 8, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentSupreme Court, Broome County, denied the Village of Johnson City’s petition to stay arbitration between the parties concerning the Village’s abolishment of certain firefighter positions. [read post]
3 May 2010, 4:37 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:02 am
Reinstatement following termination pursuant to §73 of the Civil Service LawMatter of Hoover v County of Broome, 23 Misc 3d 1134(A) Judge Phillip R. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Microsoft Corp., 309 F.3d 193, 202 (4th Cir. 2002) (“allegations must be stated in terms that are neither vague nor conclusory’”); Browning v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 7:26 am
Source: State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 8:33 am
Jackson v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 8:03 am
More on the Supreme Court's 2008 lethal injection ruling, Baze v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:47 am
PROPERTY – FROZEN BURST WATER PIPES – VACANCY – REASONABLE CARE TO MAINTAIN HEAT Landsman v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 3:25 am
Reinstatement following termination pursuant to §73 of the Civil Service LawMatter of Hoover v County of Broome, 23 Misc 3d 1134(A)Keith Hoover sued Broome County, seeking a court order annulling the County’s decision to “terminate his employment” pursuant to Civil Service Law §73,* and compelling his reinstatement with back salary and employment benefits.Although not so stated in the decision, [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 10:34 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 10:45 am
Given this factual vacuum and the precedent of Louisiana v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:45 am
Given this factual vacuum and the precedent of Louisiana v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 2:28 am
See all stories on this topic  People v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:31 am
The decision was an exception to the United States Supreme Court decision in April 2008 in Baze v. [read post]
