Search for: "Babis v. Babis"
Results 121 - 140
of 4,338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2013, 4:04 pm
In response to some of the comments received on our series about the Baby Girl case (posted on Prawfs earlier this week; the final post, with links to the others, is here), my co-author Kim Pearson addresses some of the family law issues: Our original posts elided the issue of the mother’s rights to make decisions about the child, and several of the comments pointed out her invisibility. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 9:52 pm
The immediate effects of Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:36 am
In this piece I will discuss how if at all this provision has been altered by the case of Proctor and Gamble v Office for Harmonisation In the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) ; Known simply as "Baby Dry"; and subsequent cases. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 10:27 am
The United States Supreme Court made it abundantly clear, in the case of Troxel v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:17 am
On 11 November 2011, Mr Justice Tugendhat granted an injunction to prohibit the harassment of actress Ting Lan Hong and her baby, the daughter of the actor Hugh Grant, by paparazzi photographers. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Dixon v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 8:00 am
v=mlWKptW74CY&feature=player_embedded#! [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:45 am
In addition, 1912(d) (active efforts) does not apply to Baby Girl’s adoption. *13. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 10:33 am
Here is the abstract: In Miller v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 7:09 am
See court's full opinion at Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
In a 2009 case, A.G.R. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 6:12 am
After the decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:01 am
This New York medical malpractice action was brought for a baby with Down's Syndrome, for the extraordinary expenses of raising the child. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:52 pm
Your baby's in a breech position, so you go to the hospital to get the baby turned around -- what's called an ECV (External Cephalic Version). [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 4:46 am
., et al. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 4:04 pm
In the case of Dupate v Latvia ([2020] ECHR 819) the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights held that the publication of covertly taken photographs of the partner of a politician leaving hospital with her newborn baby was a violation of her Article 8 rights. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 11:16 am
Supreme Court oral argument in Astrue v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:35 am
Baby Girl. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 4:20 pm
By Mitchel Wilson In Mocic v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 10:17 am
There is no case of Smith v. [read post]
