Search for: "Baird v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2013, 10:44 am
In Teed v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 10:22 am
" As Justice Ginsburg pointedly reminded counsel during oral argument in the Travelers Casualty v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
" In Baird v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:07 pm
Baird, Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
Baird that single people also had the right to use contraceptives. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:30 am
In Pimentel v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:30 am
In Pimentel v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 2:19 pm
Baird v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm
Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972) Roe v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm
State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Baird (1979), and then again in Hodgson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Baird (1979), and then again in Hodgson v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:07 pm
Baird], and Carey [v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 2:09 pm
The district court in ASARCO LLC v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
Baird that single people also had the right to use contraceptives. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm
Vanessa Baird in the New Internationalist blog has reported about reactions to the deal from the Media Democracy festival, and has called Rupert Murdoch “only part of the problem. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 3:49 am
At least the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) in Olympia-Rabatt stated that the relevant provisions of the German Olympia Protection Act 2004 must be interpreted restrictively. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:56 pm
Baird, 405 U. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:25 pm
(United States v. [read post]