Search for: "Baker v. Superior Court"
Results 121 - 140
of 257
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2013, 8:47 am
Lake County Superior Court Judge John M. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1352-53 (Cal. 1996); Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass’n v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 7:20 am
In this week’s case (Dunn v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 10:09 am
Looking further to Supreme Court precedent in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 8:25 am
Bonilla v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:30 pm
Anthony V. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:58 am
” In trial before the North Carolina Superior Court, Iredell County, Hoover was convicted of the charge and sentenced to hang. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 2:05 am
Now, in Baker v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 10:06 am
Superior Court, 3 Cal. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 12:15 pm
The affidavit of a child can occasionally be helpful to your client’s case; as the court put it in L.E.G. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 9:30 am
District Court of Eastern Pennsylvania's decision in Synthes, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 3:25 pm
The Seventh Circuit, in Baker v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:55 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas in Mary Kay, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 4:08 am
Giving the employer's counsel unbridled access to ex parte communications with an employee's treating physicians would create numerous potential dangers, as noted in Baker [Baker v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 4:28 pm
Baker v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
Superior Court (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 197, 213-214.) [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:32 am
The Appellate Division of the Board affirmed, and McRae then sought judicial review in superior court, which likewise upheld the decision of the ALJ.McRae appealed from the judgment of the superior court and argued that the Act does not compel her to authorize her treating physician to communicate ex parte with representatives of her employer, and that her right to medical privacy is protected by both Georgia law and the Privacy Rule of the Health Insurance… [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:00 am
The employee claimed that the company had engaged in an unsavory business practice but the Superior Court of Middlesex disagreed, characterizing the employee's claim as simply a business disagreement. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Byrnes, The Supreme Court [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
BAKER, Appellant, v. [read post]
