Search for: "Bartlett v. Duty"
Results 121 - 140
of 194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Nev. 2011) (FDA compliance “relevant and admissible” but not “a bar to recovery”); Bartlett v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 9:17 am
Name brand manufacturer not liable under any (unspecified) theories for lack of duty. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
Freed, Center for Political Accountability, on Friday, February 26, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 11:22 am
Wyeth, Inc., 588 F.3d 603 (8th Cir. 2009); Bartlett v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:16 am
Bank, University of California, Los Angeles, on Thursday, August 18, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Compensation guidelines, Compensation ratios, Corporate culture, Executive Compensation,Labor markets, Management, Taxation Political Contributions and Lobbying Proposals Posted by Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Thursday, August 18, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 9:21 am
According to our tipster, the Judge was forced to evacuate his chambers along with "clerks Matt Bartlett and Meehan Rasch. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 6:33 am
Kus v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
Nor is there a duty to test a product in the absence of any knowable risk. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
Darren Flynn, et al. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 6:06 am
Posted by V. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 1:29 pm
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
And drug companies are deep pockets, so these cases provide one instance after another (Bartlett was another SJS/TENS case) of courts leaning over backwards to justify liability. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 3:02 am
March 23, 2016), and Barcal v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
Racky, deceased v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:32 pm
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT -- STATEMENT -- PREDIWAVE V. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Yates v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 11:16 am
See FDA v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:25 pm
It is impossible for Mutual to comply with both its federal-law duty not to alter sulindac’s label or composition and its state-law duty to either strengthen the warnings on the label or change sulindac’s design. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:01 am
That argument was raised recently in a commentary by Bartlett D. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Gubler (Arizona State University), on Monday, April 8, 2024 Tags: corporate boards, corporate law, directors, Fiduciary duties, Shareholder value, Stakeholders Delaware Supreme Court Holds Entire Fairness Applicable to All Conflicted Controller Transactions Posted by Gregory V. [read post]
