Search for: "Baum v. Baum" Results 121 - 140 of 220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2015, 4:25 am by Amy Howe
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral arguments in Glossip v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "Turning to defendant's conduct after he learned of the title defects, as stated in Logalbo v Plishkiii, Rubano & Baum, supra: While the issue of whether certain conduct constitutes legal malpractice normally requires a factual determination to be made by a jury . . , , a plaintiff will be entitled to summary judgment in a case where there is no conflict at all in the evidence, the defendant's conduct fell below any permissible standard of due care, and… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "Turning to defendant's conduct after he learned of the title defects, as stated in Logalbo v Plishkiii, Rubano & Baum, supra: While the issue of whether certain conduct constitutes legal malpractice normally requires a factual determination to be made by a jury . . , , a plaintiff will be entitled to summary judgment in a case where there is no conflict at all in the evidence, the defendant's conduct fell below any permissible standard of due care, and… [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "Turning to defendant's conduct after he learned of the title defects, as stated in Logalbo v Plishkiii, Rubano & Baum, supra: While the issue of whether certain conduct constitutes legal malpractice normally requires a factual determination to be made by a jury . . , , a plaintiff will be entitled to summary judgment in a case where there is no conflict at all in the evidence, the defendant's conduct fell below any permissible standard of due care, and… [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 pm by Craig Robins
Baum, P.C. that brought an incredible 12,000 foreclosure lawsuits last year. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Baum, of Staten Island, NY, represented the husband. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 3:25 am by SHG
Schwake, 967 F.3d at 948; Baum, 903 F.3d at 586; Doe v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Bells v Foster   2011 NY Slip Op 03195   Decided on April 19, 2011   Appellate Division, Second Department  say:  "Here, the plaintiff failed to establish her prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law because she failed to demonstrate that any negligence on the defendant's part in failing to timely cancel the contract of sale on her behalf was the sole proximate cause of her damages (see Snolis v Clare, 81 AD3d… [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Joshua Matz
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
They failed to demonstrate that the appellants' alleged malpractice (the failure to tender written notice of cancellation of the contract of sale) was a proximate cause of their damages (see Bells v Foster, 83 AD3d 876, 877; compare Logalbo v Plishkin, Rubano & Baum, 163 AD2d 511). [read post]