Search for: "Bay v. Bay et al" Results 121 - 140 of 564
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2018, 11:38 am by Sarah Grant, Jack Goldsmith
In President Trump’s first year in office, these U.S. forces conducted ground and air combat operations in conjunction with Iraqi government forces, Syrian opposition forces, and coalition partners against ISIS, al-Qaeda, and affiliated groups. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 10:00 am by Chris Mirasola
During two days of nonclassified argumentation, the defendants in U.S. v Khalid Sheikh Mohammed et al. argued that the government has delayed, denied, and/or destroyed discovery documents. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:31 am by Maseeh Moradi
Green Bay Co., 80 U.S. 166 (1872). [4] United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm by Bill Marler
On August 18, 2016, Sea Port Products Corp. initiated a voluntary recall of three lots of frozen Bay Scallops produced on November 23 and 24, 2015. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 3:00 am by Barry Sookman
Tarpley https://t.co/byH6YUw7xY -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2017-02-07 https://t.co/sfPQQM4coK -> Settlement approved Re Nortel Networks Corporation et al, 2017 ONSC 700 https://t.co/2lVpXApAnv -> Vizio TVs secretly tracked viewership in U.S. without consent – Business https://t.co/TY81U9rHdQ -> Musician appeals Bieber copyright squabble https://t.co/NWlaMVuh0e -> Search Engines & Copyright Holders Ready Voluntary Anti-Piracy Code… [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 9:58 pm by David Cheifetz
It’s small, in light of his other issues, but Donald Trump is once again embroiled in litigation, albeit outside of the United States, which may result in findings against him of at least negligent misrepresentation sufficient to produce personal liability: see Singh v Trump et al, 2016 ONCA 747 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/gv3z7>. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 3:26 am
The correct analysis was that the infringer must have intended to distribute much more widely than to one downloader, and thus his acts amounted to an attempt to distribute to such an extent as to affect prejudicially the copyright owner.Laddie et al (5th), [20.26], p 823, referring to the phrase in section 23(d) of the CDPA, calls it “a sweeping up provision which would appear to cover most forms of handling of infringing copies not covered elsewhere. [read post]