Search for: "Bear Stops v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 1,132
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2022, 8:39 am
Yesterday, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a ruling on the parties' motions for summary judgment in Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am by Doyle Hodges
§ 332 states, “Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may … use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion” (emphasis added). [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:06 am by Albert W. Alschuler
That crime consists of an agreement to oppose by force the authority of the United States or to hinder the execution of federal law. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
No. 4J, 301 Or. 358 (1986), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 480 U.S. 942 (1987) (over the dissenting votes of Brennan, Marshall, & O'Connor, JJ.); United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 12:58 pm by Michael Lowe
Ring camera videos on YouTube can be fun: there are bears in backyard pools and cute kids in doorways. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 10:03 am by Joel R. Brandes
May 7, 2008) (holding that the parties’ custody agreement that stated that after returning to Colombia the child could move to the United States if he so desired was insufficient to establish the petitioner consented to retention of the child in the United States). [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 9:04 pm by Guest Contributor
Recent foodborne illnesses have raised questions about the legal status of tara (Caesalpinia spinosa) under United States food law. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Against this backdrop it bears remembering that Chief Justice Roberts has himself been a reliably conservative vote and voice on many important constitutional matters, and that he often eschews incrementalism in favor of sweeping conservative change.One important example is Roberts’ authorship of the 2013 case of Shelby County v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:58 am by Emma Snell
The evacuation will be carried out by trains and by buses, and those who refuse to evacuate will have to sign “a certain form of refusal from mandatory evacuation” stating they understand and are aware of all the consequences of staying in the combat zones and bear personal responsibility for their lives, Vereshchuk added. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am by Ryan Goodman
The speech, even if erroneous or knowingly false might fall outside First Amendment protections, especially if they were spoken by an ordinary person, not the President of the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 11:16 pm by Florian Mueller
But in case he hasn't noticed, the Netherlands is not the 51st state of the United States but a member state of the European Union.In the EU, however,the standard is different. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 9:07 am by Trevor Cutaiar
On June 6, 2022, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit handed down its decision in Jarvis v. [read post]