Search for: "Bell v. Wilson" Results 121 - 124 of 124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2007, 5:07 am
Respondent neither sent the consent order to his client for review, nor even inform his client that he had prepared one.Based on the findings of fact, the hearing court concluded that Respondent, by failing to act expeditiously in both cases, by not timely preparing the EDRO in the Beier case and by his delay in preparing the consent order in the Wilson case, violated Rule 1.3. [read post]