Search for: "Bender v. Bender"
Results 121 - 140
of 445
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2020, 5:00 am
In the case of Scalla v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
Dec. 1, 2023 Bender, P.J.E., McCaffery, J., and Stevens, P.J.E.) [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
In the case of Leight v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
In the non-precedential case of Hare v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:21 pm
In its recent decision in the case of Longwell v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 9:06 am
That is, a client must establish "actual and ascertainable damaes" (Boone v Bender, 74 AD3d 1111, 1112 [2010] [internal quotation marks and citations ommitted]; see Ehlinger v Ruberti, Girvin & Ferlazzo, 304 AD2d 925, 926 [2003]) that would not have occurred "but for" the attorney's conduct (Boone v Bender, 74 AD3d at 1113; see Ulico Cas. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 3:00 am
In the case of Mader v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Keefer v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:25 am
Co. of Am. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 7:36 am
Exch. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:54 am
Oct. 22, 2014 Gantman, P.J., Bender, P.J.E., and Platt, J.) [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:34 am
Corp v James J. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 5:00 am
March 1, 2021 Bender, P.J.E., Olson, J., and King, J.) [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 3:47 am
Samsung Electronics Co., LTD, et al. (06/21/2007, non-precedential): appeal of reduced fees & cost award (this particular appeal in the string of intellectual property litigation is not patent-specific)Bender v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 1:01 pm
So, cogitating in the after-hours, I resolved to claim the informally-reserved spot for my more-modest vehicle, to whom the occasional bumper-bender offers less offense. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 8:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 1:12 am
Interestingly, in setting out the arguments that employees would occasionally make on this issue, Wage Law mentions Bender v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:55 pm
In Knox-Bender v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 12:14 am
Sherry Bender KINGS COUNTYLegal Profession Firm's Cross-Claim Against Another Firm Dismissed; Inextricably Linked With Plaintiffs' Dismissed Claim Richardson v. [read post]
