Search for: "Bies v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 682
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2008, 7:21 am
In opposition to the State Farm defendants' motion, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320). [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am by INFORRM
In the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) Nicol J held that a Government Press Release  which meant that the claimant,  Dr Salman Butt, was an extremist hate speaker constituted a statement of opinion, not of fact. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 6:24 am
The TMR is published bi-monthly and reaches more than 65,000 members of the IP community. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 3:35 am
The letter further stated that although no one at BI had read the e-mails yet, BI believed that any potential privilege attached to the communications had been waived by use of BI's e-mail system. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Bies (08-598), on a claim of interference  by a federal appeals court with a state court over a mental retardation issue in a death penalty case. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 11:52 am
Gregory ValenzaThe Daily Journal2 November 2007REST BREAK AND MEAL PERIOD CLAIMS AFTER MURPHY V. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 10:31 am
  "For the reasons stated herein, the New Motion is denied. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 10:31 am
  "For the reasons stated herein, the New Motion is denied. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 6:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Pignoloni v Gallagher, Slip Copy, 2012 WL 5904440 (E.D.N.Y.), Petitioner Fabrizio Pignoloni ("Petitioner") filed a petition under the Hague Convention seeking an order directing Respondent Luise Ann Gallagher ("Respondent") to return their two minor sons, E.G.P. and A.T.P. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
”Henry loved when he was in "shear mode"Claim "Interpretation"  - it is all about what you say and disclaimWith the old "Construction" heading now replaced with "Interpretation", Mr Justice Carr stated he would be applying"principles concerning normal interpretation and equivalents set out by the Supreme Court in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48, [2018] and by the Patents Court in Mylan v Yeda [2017] EWHC 2629 (Pat)… [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 20 provides that the requested State shall represent the requesting State in an proceedings in the requested State arising out of a request for extradition. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:57 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Why Autonomous Concepts Are not That Autonomous After All Franco Peirone, Another Brick in the Building of the EU Rule of Law: Anti-Corruption Case Notes Giacomo Biagioni, Recognition of a Danish Monetary Penalty in Employment Matters and Public Policy Alessandro Nascimbeni, The Italian Supreme Court and the European ne bis in idem Principle: A Correct Decision Worthy of Some Criticism Matilde Rocca, Upholding Maritime Migrants’ Rights at the Borders of Europe –… [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 10:48 am
Supreme Court struck down a portion of the Bi-Partisan Campaign Reform Act. [read post]