Search for: "Bies v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 779
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2021, 2:01 pm
The case was heard before the United States Supreme Court, and it was Brady v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 12:45 am
Moreover, Richter stated that all arguments it put forward with regard to the patent as granted applied a fortiori to the auxiliary requests. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:04 am
Secondly, by examining more briefly the significance for the EU and its Member States of the change in the UK’s status from Member State to third country. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am
Under German insolvency law, the debtor does not lose its legal capacity even if it loses the power to administer and dispose of the insolvency estate (see Schulte, Patentgesetz mit EPÜ, 10th edition, Introduction, paragraph 217).3.3 For the reasons stated above, the board had no reason to interrupt t [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:28 am
The United States, meanwhile, firmly backed its ally, the Philippines. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:45 pm
Finally, the ECtHR recalls that the dominant position that State institutions occupy, requires them to exercise restraint in the use of criminal proceedings such as in cases to protect the reputation of the Prime Minister as a representative of the State. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
They argued that their clients shouldn’t have to pay taxes (United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 7:08 am
By communication dated 18 May 2020 the Board informed the parties that the oral proceedings had been rescheduled for 8 February 2021.V. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 8:51 am
The July 2020 decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
Art. 40 Brussels I Bis [10] See ECJ July, 13, 2006, C-4/03, Gat v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 7:13 am
The general rule regarding this relation is laid down in Article 71 Brussels I-bis Regulation and entails that the Brussels I-bis Regulation does not affect any specialized Conventions to which the Member States are parties. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 12:38 am
Such a contractual approach is confirmed by the CJEU when it states that the parties must negotiate in good faith. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 2:06 am
Possibly the latter is contended not only to respond to systemic coherence with the remainder of Rome II, but also to narrow down options: in Rome II the “habitual residence” of a legal person corresponds only with its “place of central administration”; in Brussels I bis its “domicile” corresponds with either “statutory seat”, “central administration” or “principal place of business” at the claimant´s choice. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 4:15 am
The complaint (full text) in Apache Stronghold v. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 10:30 am
In 2011, she was diagnosed with bi-polar disorder. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 10:11 am
” Thurston v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 9:09 am
Patzwald v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:49 pm
Program v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:39 am
In this context, however, the Enlarged Board of Appeal also stated that a complainant cannot shift his responsibility for fulfilling the requirements for an admissible appeal to the Board of Appeal. [read post]
