Search for: "Bill Brady v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 196
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2012, 3:10 am by SHG
At Sentencing Law and Policy, Doug Berman posts part of the Constitution Projects' statement urging Congress to enact legislation to ensure that federal prosecutors fulfill their obligations under Brady v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:35 am by Dan Hargrove
Brady of the Middle District of Louisiana to one count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud and one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States and to pay and receive health care kickbacks. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 7:41 am by Steve Hall
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:00 am by Rob Robinson
bit.ly/uG28zd (Bill Tolson) Computer Fraud and Abuse Act 101 - bit.ly/uwfE6X (Shawn Tuna) Conn. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am by Conor McEvily
Cain, the Court held that the failure of prosecutors in the New Orleans district attorney’s office to fulfill their constitutional duty (under the 1963 decision in Brady v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:35 am by SHG
A few days ago, the New York Times had an insipid editorial deriding the failure of prosecutors to honor their obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence pursuant to Brady v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:27 am by Austin Williams
  Upon agreement by all parties, Judge Nelson ordered Brady v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
  In 1988, the state botched D’Ambrosio’s trial by violating Brady v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:34 pm by KC Johnson
Under the Supreme Court's precedent in Brady v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:23 pm by royblack
This week in Ashcroft v. [read post]