Search for: "Bishop v Bishop" Results 121 - 140 of 1,392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2011, 12:49 am by Rachit Buch
The High Court was asked to determine, before the trial of the allegation, whether the diocese – that is, the district under supervision of the Bishop – could be held liable for Father Baldwin’s acts; whether the principle of vicarious liability applies to a diocesan bishop for the acts of a priest he has appointed. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:36 pm
But while a "diocese" may thus be seen as continuous in the eyes of the Episcopal Church, that entity, as well as the entity that departed the Church, are each still governed by, and subject to, the "First Amendment rights of individuals and corporations (see Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 3:14 am by Broc Romanek
Boiled down to the essentials, this is the question decided yesterday by the Court of Appeal in Jenks v. [read post]
25 Dec 2019, 4:48 pm by Legal Profession Prof
Four bar discipline decisions from the Ohio Supreme Court December 24, 2019 Toledo Bar Assn v. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:23 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Keith Paul Bishop posted on a recent Nevada case holding that the inherent fairness standard cannot be used to rebut the business judgment rule: In Guzman v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 3:15 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a lengthy opinion today in Bishop v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:06 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law What does the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals panel decide in its 106 page divided opinions in Bishop v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 5:10 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Keith Paul Bishop reports: California Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis issued her ruling yesterday on the parties' respective motions for summary judgment in Crest v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm by Joshua Fershee
Earlier this week, Professor Bainbridge posted California court completely bollixes up business law nomenclature, discussing Keith Paul Bishop's post on Curci Investments, LLC v. [read post]