Search for: "Bobbitt" Results 121 - 140 of 247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2008, 10:48 pm
In this respect, Posner's opposite number is not a usual liberal suspect like Laurence Tribe, but Philip Bobbitt, who argues for the value of multiple modalities of interpretation.Posner won praise from liberals for criticizing Robert Bork's originalism when Bork was nominated for the Court. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 12:20 pm
In today's NYT, superprawf  Philip Bobbitt and former senator and ambassador John C. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:40 am by Benjamin Wittes
The interrogation of Guy Fawkes–which was not pretty–and its interesting relation to modern interrogation disputes is also the subject of a brief but fascinating discussion in Philip Bobbitt’s monumental book, Terror and Consent:  The Wars of the Twenty-First Century. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:47 am by Lawrence Solum
Public international law (Philip Bobbitt, Columbia Law School). 6. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 3:27 pm by Josh Blackman
Philip Bobbitt writes that the House should pause the impeachment process. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:22 pm by Attorney Theodore Ronca
A carrier not following up should be alerted to the existence of such decisions as “Bobbitt. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:57 am by Lawrence Solum
This is pursued through a critical discussion of the influential theories of constitutional and legal interpretation advanced by Philip Bobbitt, Ronald Dworkin and Jules Coleman. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:27 am by Lawrence Solum
This is pursued through a critical discussion of the influential theories of constitutional and legal interpretation advanced by Philip Bobbitt, Ronald Dworkin and Jules Coleman. [read post]
20 May 2022, 8:31 am by JB
For this reason, I think about the modalities differently than Bobbitt does.First, I emphasize that the modalities are problem solving devices. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 7:59 am
Indeed, the article says in conclusion (as Philip Bobbitt has noted) cost benefit analysis is "relentlessly tactical," not strategic; it also tends toward serial 'event specific catastrophism' as its analytic frame; and it is a method of evaluating proposed courses of action, not generating them, and hence promotes a strategically questionable tendency to reaction as a response to terrorism. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:03 pm by Ian Bartrum
  As Philip Bobbitt said “law is something we do, not something we have”. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 3:30 pm
" --Philip Bobbitt, Author of The Shield of Achilles: War, Peace, and the Course of History, Director of the Center for National Security at Columbia University"In this timely book, Patterson and Afilalo remind us that international trade is not just crucial to prosperity, but to world peace as well. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:58 pm by Lawrence Solum
 Indeed, the most popular rival to originalism today (some version of Bobbitt's multiple modalities view or Stephen Griffin's pluralist approach) explicitly rejects the idea that the text has lexical priority among the various considerations that (according to pluralism) are the appropriate sources of constitutonal reasons. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 12:10 pm by Vanessa Sauter
  Philip Bobbitt offered an alternative approach to defusing the ongoing crisis with North Korea. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Bobbitt is the Herbert Wechsler Professor of Federal Jurisprudence and director for the Center for National Security at Columbia Law School. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 10:18 am by Garrett Hinck
Philip Bobbitt argued that North Korea has misunderstood the United States’ disincentives to push for regime change in Pyongyang. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:49 am by Victoria Clark
Philip Bobbitt criticized the argument that the president can pardon himself. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 9:17 am by Victoria Gallegos
Philip Bobbitt argued against a late Senate impeachment trial. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 7:59 am
One important task of this article is to rethink the familiar model of modalities of argument offered by Philip Bobbitt and Richard Fallon; and to offer a different version that better reflects the multiple ways that lawyers and judges actually use history in constitutional argument. [read post]