Search for: "Boone v. US Attorney" Results 121 - 132 of 132
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2008, 9:58 am
Gary Boone was ultimately declared the winner, but not until 1999, twenty-eight years after the first patent application was filed.While IPBiz does not think one has to be a registered patent attorney to make comments about patent reform, when oneisn't a patent attorney, one really needs to show some knowledge of the patent system to be credible. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
Unfortunately, may associates are worried there will be a stigma associated with working fewer hours. [43] They worry they will be seen as undedicated, mediocre attorneys. [44] There will always be a hungry young associate willing to step up and put in the hours. [45] V. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 4:05 am
But in her recent ruling, McClure noticed a "distinguishable" difference between that case (Houser v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 10:37 am
Rather Lemley claimed that the technology that in Boone's patent, titled "Single Chip Integrated Circuit Computer Architecture" was not caught up in a patent thicket in part because the Hyatt v. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 12:07 am
James Boon (Bristows), who was involved in the Aerotel appeal, presented an overview of the judgment itself. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 8:26 am
The Maryland Court of Appeals overturned the Maryland Court of Special Appeals in a 4-3 decision in Goldberg v. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 8:26 am
The Maryland Court of Appeals overturned the Maryland Court of Special Appeals in a 4-3 decision in Goldberg v. [read post]