Search for: "Bower v. Bower" Results 121 - 140 of 621
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2020, 4:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As there is no evidence suggesting that Grover & Fensterstock was aware of or part of Lauria’s fraudulent scheme, none of the exceptions to the privity requirement are applicable here (see Mauro v Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 116 AD3d 930, 933 [2d Dept 2014]; Chemical Bank v Bowers, 228 AD2d 407, 408 [2d Dept 1996]; see also Hinnant v Carrington Mtge. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
  Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Lachaux, it will often be best to leave the matter for trial (see, for example, Steyn J, in James v Saunders [2019] EWHC 3265 (QB) at [16]-[17]), although as indicated by Warby J in Hamilton v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2020] EWHC 59 (QB) there will be cases where the issue can sensibly be dealt with at a preliminary trial. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:58 am by Adam Feldman
Separate opinion utility Looking back at some of the most impactful dissents as measured using Cole’s criteria, Justice John Paul Stevens’ dissent from Bowers v. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 8:54 am by Andrew Koppelman
  A rejection of the discrimination claim is likely to produce widespread outrage, somewhat like the backlash against its 1986 Bowers v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” Chris Geidner writes in an op-ed for The New York Times that in his dissenting opinions in Bowers v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:27 pm by Ilya Somin
The Court eventually overruled Bowers in Lawrence v. [read post]