Search for: "Brady v. State of California"
Results 121 - 140
of 302
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
Franklin California Tax-Free Trust, 15-233, and Acosta-Febo v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
It asks (1) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that the state’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence violated its obligation under Brady v. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am
Cain 14-10008Issue: (1) Whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that the State’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence violated its obligation under Brady v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
His petition asks (1) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that the state’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence violated its obligation under Brady v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 9:28 am
To facilitate compliance with Brady v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
Rule 16(a)(6) is a catchall clause that requires the government to “[a]dvise the defendant’s attorney of evidence favorable to the defendant and material to the defendant’s guilt or punishment to which defendant is entitled pursuant to Brady and United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
The defense and the defendant have no idea whether Brady material exists. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:48 pm
Nor did either Brady or Fed. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:56 am
First, United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 12:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Imburgia 14-462Issue: Whether the California Court of Appeal erred by holding, in direct conflict with the Ninth Circuit, that a reference to state law in an arbitration agreement governed by the Federal Arbitration Act requires the application of state law preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 6:07 am
But here’s another doozy: The People (of California) v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Imburgia 14-462Issue: Whether the California Court of Appeal erred by holding, in direct conflict with the Ninth Circuit, that a reference to state law in an arbitration agreement governed by the Federal Arbitration Act requires the application of state law preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:24 am
California, for example, has estimated that it is able to collect only about 4% of the use taxes due on sales from out-of-state vendors. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am
United States, or (b) “preventing further [government] disclosure,” United States v. [read post]
